Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Da Costa)(EPTC#3)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 2.83 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings13 teams · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Cedillos)(EPTC#5)120501025353
2GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Arreola)(EPTC#1)93421848463
3GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Baeza)(EPCC#1)93352554443
4GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Alarcon)(TW#1)84402054457
5GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Cardenas)(CCC)75293172560
6GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Boss)(NMSU#2)66312967528
7GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Da Costa)(EPTC#3)66273374567
8GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Delgado)(EPTC#2)57293168534
9GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Dennis)(FB)57243677536
10GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Martinez)(EPTC#4)48253574547
11GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Jabor)(EPCC#2)48243679579
12GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Molina)(TW#2)39213982569
13GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Loken)(NMSU#1)0121149105659

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Belinda Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 3.5
2.99
Gloria King
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3
2.93
Ariana Dominguez
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.84
Esther Orona
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 3
2.68
Cristina da Costa
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.38
Esther McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Clara C Esparza
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Eugenie Montague
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Cecilia Delgado
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
Jennifer Ibarra
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #2 Singles 30% · published
Kismet Sozer
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published
Nelly Jallad
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Patricia Moye Holderman
usually #2 Doubles 59%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published
Rachel Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Randi Cabrera
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Rosario Mendoza
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Sheby Parker
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Yuri Caire
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Belinda Fernandez + Sheby Parker5164% games+14.5% vs expected
Kismet Sozer + Randi Cabrera7751% games+9.9% vs expected
Cristina da Costa + Rosario Mendoza5851% games+8.1% vs expected
Randi Cabrera + Patricia Moye Holderman2744% games+1.7% vs expected
Randi Cabrera + Cristina da Costa6946% games+0.4% vs expected
Cristina da Costa + Sheby Parker2639% games+0.2% vs expected
Esther Orona + Gloria King11753% gamesnot enough data
Kismet Sozer + Sheby Parker3841% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Belinda Fernandez
57W–57L career · type A · 30 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Gloria King
100W–61L career · 62 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Ariana Dominguez
32W–22L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Esther Orona
115W–106L career · 37 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Cristina da Costa
67W–92L career · 20 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Esther McCarthy
75W–87L career · 24 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.38
2.5
Clara C Esparza
16W–32L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Eugenie Montague
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Cecilia Delgado
28W–43L career · 33 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Jennifer Ibarra
35W–38L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kismet Sozer
41W–53L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nelly Jallad
28W–37L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Moye Holderman
66W–54L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Wallace
6W–22L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Randi Cabrera
55W–66L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rosario Mendoza
34W–41L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheby Parker
53W–44L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yuri Caire
50W–38L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.