Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Dennis)(FB)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 2.88 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMelinda Pineda / Loretta Pineda vs Celia Al-Tahan / Denisse Arras6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-11-25Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLoretta Pineda vs Gloria King6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-11-19Won 10
W#1 SinglesLoretta Pineda vs Erika Castaneda6-4, 6-2
2024-11-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLoretta Pineda / Michele Zerah vs Kati Hunyadi / Flor Tovar2-6, 3-6
2024-10-08Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLoretta Pineda vs Camila Olmos4-6, 6-7
2024-09-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesEufemia Garcia / Loretta Pineda vs Perla Carrillo / Roxanna Medina6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Cedillos)(EPTC#5)120501025353
2GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Arreola)(EPTC#1)93421848463
3GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Baeza)(EPCC#1)93352554443
4GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Alarcon)(TW#1)84402054457
5GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Cardenas)(CCC)75293172560
6GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Boss)(NMSU#2)66312967528
7GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Da Costa)(EPTC#3)66273374567
8GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Delgado)(EPTC#2)57293168534
9GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Dennis)(FB)57243677536
10GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Martinez)(EPTC#4)48253574547
11GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Jabor)(EPCC#2)48243679579
12GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Molina)(TW#2)39213982569
13GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Loken)(NMSU#1)0121149105659

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ana Navedo
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
2.71
Alison Krattiger
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.51
Cecilia Marquez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 19% · published 3
1.86
Anna Burford
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Erika Centeno
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Eufemia Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Jamie Salerno
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Jassivy Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Krista Dennis
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Leticia Augsberger
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Loretta Pineda
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Melinda Pineda
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michele Zerah
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Ruthann Ordaz
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Sharon Ransom
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Vera Ray
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Yazmin Pineda
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eufemia Garcia + Sharon Ransom161252% games+6.0% vs expected
Vera Ray + Sharon Ransom91344% games+4.3% vs expected
Yazmin Pineda + Jassivy Hernandez11658% gamesnot enough data
Eufemia Garcia + Cecilia Marquez7456% gamesnot enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker + Sharon Ransom5355% gamesnot enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker + Alison Krattiger2644% gamesnot enough data
Eufemia Garcia + Jassivy Hernandez1634% gamesnot enough data
Michele Zerah + Ruthann Ordaz3351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ana Navedo
18W–13L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Alison Krattiger
30W–54L career · 37 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Cecilia Marquez
64W–57L career · 15 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Anna Burford
3W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Erika Centeno
36W–25L career · 37 lines in 2025
not enough data
Eufemia Garcia
81W–125L career · 32 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
61W–87L career · 30 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jamie Salerno
2W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jassivy Hernandez
55W–42L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data
Krista Dennis
31W–28L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leticia Augsberger
26W–61L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Loretta Pineda
13W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melinda Pineda
2W–10L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Zerah
13W–43L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ruthann Ordaz
34W–34L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Ransom
66W–107L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vera Ray
31W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yazmin Pineda
42W–37L career · 34 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.