Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Arreola)(EPTC#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.20 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-05Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMia Montelongo vs Ida Santillan3-6, 0-6
2024-11-01Won 10
W#2 SinglesMia Montelongo vs Luisana Montoya6-4, 7-5
2024-10-01Won 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Odell / Mia Montelongo vs Lourdes Olivas / Patricia Samonte7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Cedillos)(EPTC#5)120501025353
2GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Arreola)(EPTC#1)93421848463
3GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Baeza)(EPCC#1)93352554443
4GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Alarcon)(TW#1)84402054457
5GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Cardenas)(CCC)75293172560
6GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Boss)(NMSU#2)66312967528
7GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Da Costa)(EPTC#3)66273374567
8GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Delgado)(EPTC#2)57293168534
9GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Dennis)(FB)57243677536
10GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Martinez)(EPTC#4)48253574547
11GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Jabor)(EPCC#2)48243679579
12GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Molina)(TW#2)39213982569
13GEPTA-3.0-Adult/18+W(Loken)(NMSU#1)0121149105659

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Beth Hoy
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.20
Camila Abbud
usually #1 Singles 35%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
2.92
Claudia Morones
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.79
Flor Tovar
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.23
Graciela Saenz
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published 2.5
Annette Hoy
published
Kati Hunyadi
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published
Laura Odell
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Leidiana Baca
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Lorena Chavez
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Mary Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Mia Montelongo
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Monica de la Torre
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Patricia Arreola
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Sara Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Stephanie Beckles
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Veronica Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica de la Torre + Patricia Arreola61145% games−7.1% vs expected
Maria del Carmen Ledezma + Sara Blanco61045% gamesnot enough data
Graciela Saenz + Veronica Gonzalez8653% gamesnot enough data
Kati Hunyadi + Flor Tovar11359% gamesnot enough data
Mary Chavez + Monica de la Torre5550% gamesnot enough data
Monica de la Torre + Laura Odell5549% gamesnot enough data
Veronica Gonzalez + Sara Blanco3550% gamesnot enough data
Laura Odell + Graciela Saenz6165% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Hoy
37W–12L career · 23 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.69
3.5
Camila Abbud
35W–22L career · 24 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Claudia Morones
48W–59L career · 24 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Flor Tovar
22W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
2.5
Graciela Saenz
52W–63L career · 16 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
Annette Hoy
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kati Hunyadi
74W–65L career · 41 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Odell
52W–43L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leidiana Baca
23W–34L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lorena Chavez
49W–59L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
22W–46L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Chavez
20W–14L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mia Montelongo
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica de la Torre
40W–41L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Arreola
47W–63L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Blanco
48W–72L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Beckles
71W–60L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Veronica Gonzalez
50W–71L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.