Teams

CDTA W 55&OW7.0 4.Schaumburg Lauterbach Sun 1 $20

CDTA 2Winter 55 & over W · E

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#2 DoublesApril Berkowski / Julie Pawula vs Susan Schierl Sullivan / Pam Cohen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMargo Carvell / April Berkowski vs Cynthia Gitter / Barbara Chmieleski6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesApril Berkowski / Ryoko Howell vs Rosa Broseman / Patricia Lozada4-6, 3-5
L#1 DoublesMitzi Kastner / April Berkowski vs Jennifer Cicciu / Sheila Weinberg2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 55&OW7.0 6.Lake Bluff Eichner Sun 6 $2010025515203
2CDTA W 55&OW7.0 4.Schaumburg Lauterbach Sun 1 $2073201022207
3CDTA W 55&OW7.0 2.Naperville Bianchi Fri 7:30 $2273191124196
4CDTA W 55&OW7.0 3.Glenbrook Edidin Sat 4 $253792146319
5CDTA W 55&OW7.0 1.Heritage Wozniewski Sat 2 $232872348314
6CDTA W 55&OW7.0 5.Centennial Okada Sat 7 $2019102043297

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Lara Phillips
published 4
3.65
Margo Carvell
published 3.5
3.58
Mya Murata
published 4
3.46
Mitzi Kastner
published 3.5
3.37
Debra Scheck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
April Berkowski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Julie Pawula
published 3.5
3.04
3.02
Ryoko Howell
published 3.5
2.92
Leanne Whitlock
published 3
2.81
Karen Hayslett
published 3
2.78
Peggy Schwerman
published 3
2.59
Lynn Callahan
published 3
Rita Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leanne Whitlock + Margo Carvell25458% games+9.0% vs expected
Mya Murata + Lara Phillips4262% games+2.1% vs expected
Lynn Callahan + Ryoko Howell5648% games+0.9% vs expected
Lynn Callahan + Mya Murata6648% games−0.1% vs expected
Ryoko Howell + Cecilia Lauterbach12758% games−4.6% vs expected
Leanne Whitlock + Mya Murata10361% games−5.4% vs expected
Leanne Whitlock + Cecilia Lauterbach2740% games−5.9% vs expected
Lynn Callahan + Lara Phillips4452% games−6.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lara Phillips
98W–91L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Margo Carvell
139W–96L career · no lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.65
4
Mya Murata
95W–100L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Mitzi Kastner
57W–47L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Debra Scheck
11W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
April Berkowski
16W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Julie Pawula
73W–120L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Cecilia Lauterbach
83W–87L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3.5
Ryoko Howell
82W–76L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Leanne Whitlock
83W–88L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Karen Hayslett
29W–28L career · type A · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Peggy Schwerman
123W–136L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Lynn Callahan
34W–108L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
Rita Williams
33W–34L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.