Teams

CDTA W 55&OW7.0 2.Naperville Bianchi Fri 7:30 $22

CDTA 2Winter 55 & over W · E

22 players · average NTRP 3.56 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesRose Northon / Erika Baka vs Cheryl Ingram / Linda Meyer3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia McCarthy / Katherine Bianchi vs Patricia Lozada / Rosa Broseman2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLori Vardas / Katherine Bianchi vs Pam Cohen / Julie Gordon6-4, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCheryl Engle / Lesa Moskowitz vs Jennifer Cicciu / Cynthia Rowe6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWendy L Flynn / Joan Vander Linde vs Karen Edidin / Donna Salvatore6-2, 6-0
L#1 DoublesMaureen Henderson / Michelle Yacullo vs Debra Scheck / Mitzi Kastner6-7, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRose Northon / Deborah Sonoda vs Lara Phillips / Rita Williams0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Bianchi / Amy Harper vs Leanne Whitlock / Mya Murata3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesWendy L Flynn / Maureen Henderson vs Sarah W Johnson / Karen Hirsch7-6, 3-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMaureen Henderson / Michelle Yacullo vs Margo Carvell / Julie Pawula6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJoan Vander Linde / Lori Vardas vs Ryoko Howell / Cecilia Lauterbach6-7, 2-4
W#3 DoublesMinami Powell / Cindy MacDonald vs Rochelle Meng / Lisa Eckenrodt6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMarie Hajduk / Rose Northon vs Meg LaMonica / Sharon Henahan6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 55&OW7.0 6.Lake Bluff Eichner Sun 6 $2010025515203
2CDTA W 55&OW7.0 4.Schaumburg Lauterbach Sun 1 $2073201022207
3CDTA W 55&OW7.0 2.Naperville Bianchi Fri 7:30 $2273191124196
4CDTA W 55&OW7.0 3.Glenbrook Edidin Sat 4 $253792146319
5CDTA W 55&OW7.0 1.Heritage Wozniewski Sat 2 $232872348314
6CDTA W 55&OW7.0 5.Centennial Okada Sat 7 $2019102043297

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Stephanie Batka
published 4
3.77
Cindy MacDonald
published 4
3.56
Dorothy OMalley
published 4
3.35
Wendy L Flynn
published 3.5
3.29
Lesa Moskowitz
published 3.5
3.28
Deborah Sonoda
published 3.5
3.27
Marie Hajduk
published 3.5
3.26
Cynthia McCarthy
published 3.5
3.26
Erika Baka
published 3.5
Amy Harper
published 3.5
3.23
Michelle Yacullo
published 3.5
3.21
Karin Carney
published 3.5
3.20
Maureen Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Cheryl Engle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Zaneta Gintautas
published 3.5
3.12
Lori Vardas
published 3.5
3.02
Larisa Adamian
published 3.5
2.98
Denise McKenna
published 3
2.98
Katherine Bianchi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joan Vander Linde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Minami Powell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rose Northon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rose Northon + Marie Hajduk4262% games+11.8% vs expected
Cindy MacDonald + Denise McKenna10263% games+9.9% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Zaneta Gintautas11364% games+6.2% vs expected
Stephanie Batka + Zaneta Gintautas7659% games+5.0% vs expected
Michelle Yacullo + Maureen Henderson5750% games+4.4% vs expected
Dorothy OMalley + Lesa Moskowitz2446% games+3.4% vs expected
Cindy MacDonald + Marie Hajduk18363% games+2.7% vs expected
Wendy L Flynn + Marie Hajduk4355% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Batka
329W–235L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.88
4
Cindy MacDonald
74W–52L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Dorothy OMalley
173W–204L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Wendy L Flynn
102W–115L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Lesa Moskowitz
134W–118L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Deborah Sonoda
22W–30L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Marie Hajduk
130W–86L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Cynthia McCarthy
76W–75L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Erika Baka
99W–71L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Amy Harper
44W–60L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Michelle Yacullo
166W–110L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Karin Carney
122W–100L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Maureen Henderson
101W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Cheryl Engle
93W–116L career · 1 line in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Zaneta Gintautas
141W–122L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Lori Vardas
164W–120L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Larisa Adamian
146W–108L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.02
3
Denise McKenna
137W–116L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Katherine Bianchi
66W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Joan Vander Linde
48W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Minami Powell
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Rose Northon
26W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.