Teams

CDTA W 55&OW7.0 1.Heritage Wozniewski Sat 2 $23

CDTA 2Winter 55 & over W · E

11 players · average NTRP 3.43 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesCarol Zorn / Sharon Henahan vs Debra Scheck / Mitzi Kastner5-7, 3-5
L#2 DoublesMary Jo Scarpelli / Carol Paddock vs Mya Murata / Leanne Whitlock1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesBarbara Chmieleski / Cynthia Gitter vs Apple Naughton / Narissa Breger1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Paddock / Patti Landreth vs Mindey Johnson / Julie Alexander3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Jo Scarpelli / Miriam Wozniewski vs Elisa Zusman / Kathleen Sullivan4-6, 1-5
L#1 DoublesBarbara Chmieleski / Cynthia Gitter vs Janet Frigo / Nancy Dolan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Paddock / Patti Landreth vs Jamie Rauscher / Chris Nelson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarol Zorn / Miriam Wozniewski vs Kim Vandegrift / Kristin MacCarthy6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCynthia Gitter / Barbara Chmieleski vs Margo Carvell / April Berkowski2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMiriam Wozniewski / Mary Jo Scarpelli vs Julie Pawula / Lynn Callahan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesPatti Landreth / Cynthia Gitter vs Valerie Anderson / Jennifer Cicciu6-1, 6-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Jo Scarpelli / Carol Paddock vs Robin Meister / Lauren Tatar6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCarol Zorn / Miriam Wozniewski vs Cynthia Rowe / Kay Noonan6-0, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMiriam Wozniewski / Cynthia Gitter vs Elizabeth Cassier / Nancy Nora2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Paddock / Mary Jo Scarpelli vs Nancy Dolan / Irene Okada6-4, 5-4
L#1 DoublesBarbara Chmieleski / Cynthia Gitter vs Diane Egan / Linda Meyer6-7, 2-3
L#2 DoublesMiriam Wozniewski / Sharon Henahan vs Patricia Lozada / Apple Naughton2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatti Landreth / Carol Zorn vs Rita Eichner / Julie Alexander2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesPatti Landreth / Sharon Henahan vs Cate Brodner / Donna Salvatore6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMiriam Wozniewski / Mary Jo Scarpelli vs Robin Meister / Karen Hirsch7-5, 3-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarol Paddock / Cynthia Gitter vs Valerie Anderson / Sheila Weinberg4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesMeg LaMonica / Sharon Henahan vs Marie Hajduk / Rose Northon1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMary Jo Scarpelli / Carol Paddock vs Karin Carney / Cynthia McCarthy4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Zorn / Cynthia Gitter vs Wendy L Flynn / Michelle Yacullo3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 55&OW7.0 6.Lake Bluff Eichner Sun 6 $2010025515203
2CDTA W 55&OW7.0 4.Schaumburg Lauterbach Sun 1 $2073201022207
3CDTA W 55&OW7.0 2.Naperville Bianchi Fri 7:30 $2273191124196
4CDTA W 55&OW7.0 3.Glenbrook Edidin Sat 4 $253792146319
5CDTA W 55&OW7.0 1.Heritage Wozniewski Sat 2 $232872348314
6CDTA W 55&OW7.0 5.Centennial Okada Sat 7 $2019102043297

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cynthia Gitter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Lynn Greisman
published 3.5
3.19
Meg LaMonica
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Carol Paddock
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.13
Patti Landreth
published 3.5
3.11
Barbara Chmieleski
published 3.5
3.05
Carol Zorn
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.78
Joan Cooney
published 3
Mary Jo Scarpelli
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Miriam Wozniewski
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Sharon Henahan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Cooney + Mary Jo Scarpelli12563% games+3.0% vs expected
Carol Paddock + Patti Landreth81547% games−2.9% vs expected
Cynthia Gitter + Barbara Chmieleski1941% games−10.8% vs expected
Carol Zorn + Barbara Chmieleski2350% games−11.2% vs expected
Cynthia Gitter + Mary Jo Scarpelli71146% games−11.7% vs expected
Carol Paddock + Mary Jo Scarpelli4348% games−12.4% vs expected
Joan Cooney + Miriam Wozniewski4933% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Chmieleski + Miriam Wozniewski3638% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Gitter
11W–27L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Lynn Greisman
24W–37L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Meg LaMonica
89W–94L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Carol Paddock
56W–62L career · 7 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Patti Landreth
46W–74L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Barbara Chmieleski
60W–158L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Carol Zorn
19W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Joan Cooney
96W–133L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Mary Jo Scarpelli
52W–62L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Miriam Wozniewski
32W–71L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Henahan
14W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.