Teams

SpringPark/Martinez W6.0S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 55 & Over ADULT · W6.0S Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-29vs LB Houston/O'Brien W6.0SWon 21
W#1 DoublesEllen Euting / Pamela Ferrell vs Kim Houlne / Amy Caron6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlma Farley / Mary Martinez vs Shawnn Henderson / Melissa Szabo5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Braswell / Sarah Montgomery vs Sharon Mistry / Delia Stein6-1, 6-1
2025-03-22vs Kiest/Langlois W6.0SWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudy Archbold / Ellen Euting vs Leah Ann Neal / Sharon Balthrop6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlma Farley / Mary Martinez vs Marlene Langlois / LINDA FEATHERSTONE6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Montgomery / Linda Braswell vs Judy Crouch / Lily Megill6-3, 6-2
2025-03-01vs Greenhill/Sanders-Savelli W6.0SWon 21
W#1 DoublesEllen Euting / Pamela Ferrell vs Gerilynn Sanders / Cynthia Savelli6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlma Farley / Lisa Stolakis vs Donna Wolf / Darci Sachdeva3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Braswell / Sarah Montgomery vs Deana Hicks / Dina Maldonado6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-23vs Kiest/Langlois W6.0SWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlma Farley / Fran Zartler vs Irene Luna / Anita Thomas4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEllen Euting / Lisa Stolakis vs LINDA FEATHERSTONE / Annette McCracken6-1, 6-0
2025-02-22vs LB Houston/O'Brien W6.0SLost 03
L#1 DoublesFran Zartler / Mary Martinez vs Dawn Goodrich / Delores Rodriguez2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJudy Archbold / Ellen Euting vs Tami Behner / Jennifer Mays2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Braswell / Sarah Montgomery vs Amy Caron / Jennifer Taffe2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-08vs Greenhill/Sanders-Savelli W6.0SLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Martinez / Sarah Montgomery vs Gerilynn Sanders / Donna Wolf2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Braswell / Linda Hodge vs Deana Hicks / Dina Maldonado3-6, 0-6
2025-02-01vs LB Houston/O'Brien W6.0SLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Hodge / Mary Martinez vs Kim Houlne / Jennifer Mays4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEllen Euting / Pamela Ferrell vs Delores Rodriguez / Jennifer Taffe6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSarah Montgomery / Fran Zartler vs Shannon Gregg / Melissa Szabo1-6, 2-6
2025-01-25vs Kiest/Langlois W6.0SWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudy Archbold / Sarah Montgomery vs Nancy Greer / Anita Thomas6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesFran Zartler / Alma Farley vs Sharon Balthrop / Irene Luna2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJan Freshwater / Mary Martinez vs Mitzi Bishop / Annette McCracken4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-01-18vs Greenhill/Sanders-Savelli W6.0SWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudy Archbold / Sarah Montgomery vs Gerilynn Sanders / Cynthia Savelli2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlma Farley / Fran Zartler vs Donna Wolf / Lorri Brehm3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPamela Ferrell / Heidi Walsh vs Deana Hicks / Zina Townley6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W6.0S Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Ellen Euting
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Fran Zartler
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.95
Pamela Ferrell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
Lisa Stolakis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Alma Farley
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
Heidi Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jan Freshwater
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Judy Archbold
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Braswell
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Linda Hodge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fran Zartler + Pamela Ferrell12853% games−6.8% vs expected
Alma Farley + Fran Zartler5161% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Euting + Judy Archbold3262% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Euting + Pamela Ferrell404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ellen Euting
9W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Fran Zartler
21W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
Pamela Ferrell
33W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Lisa Stolakis
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Alma Farley
8W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Heidi Walsh
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jan Freshwater
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Judy Archbold
10W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Braswell
14W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Hodge
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Martinez
3W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.