Teams

Shrewsbury-Topsl

2025 OWB Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-06vs Butcher-SandestinSplit 22
W#1 DoublesVirginia Ballard / Cindy White vs Angie Baggett / Amy Engleman6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJamie Shrewsbury vs Shannon Widman6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnne Johnson / Lydia Casey vs Christy Butcher / Stephanie Buckner7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRita Myler / Jodie Phillips vs Helen Collias / Tawny Tapp5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2025-04-04vs Butcher-SandestinWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy White / Virginia Ballard vs Angie Baggett / Amy Engleman6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJamie Shrewsbury vs Amanda Sills2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Johnson / Lydia Casey vs Christy Butcher / Tessa Bryan7-6, 6-4
2025-03-30vs Halstead-Camp CreekWon 21
L#1 DoublesLydia Casey / Anne Johnson vs Kristine Cox / Peggy Ditmore4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Harris / Shawn Dishman vs Marci Knauss / Jennifer Hernandez6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJamie Shrewsbury / Shellie Rowe vs Carrie Halstead / Deanna Hibbard5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-16vs Halstead-Camp CreekLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Johnson / Virginia Ballard vs Kristine Cox / Christine Davidson4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJamie Shrewsbury vs Peggy Ditmore6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVictoria Santa Maria / Jodie Phillips vs Donna Capozzoli / Patricia Haywood2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-02-02vs Morgan-WatersoundWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Johnson / Virginia Ballard vs Catherine Morgan / MISSY HANNAHAN6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJamie Shrewsbury vs Jamie Lynn1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesShellie Rowe / Lydia Casey vs Beth Kimche / Stephanie Wiesel6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Anne Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Jodie Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Jamie Shrewsbury
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.62
Victoria Santa Maria
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shellie Rowe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Virginia Ballard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anne Johnson
4W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Jodie Phillips
110W–116L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Jamie Shrewsbury
29W–31L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Victoria Santa Maria
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
Lisa Harris
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shellie Rowe
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Virginia Ballard
7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.