Teams

Morgan-Watersound

2025 OWB Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-06vs OWB/Gibson/40&Over3.5WLost 04
L#1 DoublesAllison Page / Beth Kimche vs Meg Castleberry / Kim Baynes0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJamie Lynn vs Nicole Perkins1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Krutz / Sterling Edison vs LeAnne Shumate / Ashley Goyne7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTracey McGuire / Brett Peterson vs Carol Block / Laurie Brown6-7, 4-6
2025-03-30vs Jimison-EdgewaterLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Morgan / MISSY HANNAHAN vs Christina Langford / Leslie Casiple3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJamie Lynn vs Michelle Shipley4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Krutz / Tracey McGuire vs Iman Elkomy / Summer King2-6, 3-6
2025-03-02vs Jimison-EdgewaterLost 04
L#1 DoublesMISSY HANNAHAN / Julie Martin vs Summer King / Iman Elkomy3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJamie Lynn vs Michelle Shipley0-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKarin Egan / Stephanie Wiesel vs Leslie Casiple / Christina Langford1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Kish / Sterling Edison vs Maureen Hess / Jennifer Heilmann5-7, 4-6
2025-02-16vs OWB/Gibson/40&Over3.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesMISSY HANNAHAN / Debbie Watson vs Carol Block / Jennifer Loggins6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKarin Egan / Beth Kimche vs Meg Castleberry / Lindy Wood4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Morgan / Brittany Tarver vs Angie Gibson / Kim Lepley1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-09vs Butcher-SandestinSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMISSY HANNAHAN / Debbie Watson vs Helen Collias / Tessa Bryan6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJamie Lynn vs Mandi Skinner6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDiana Kish / Sterling Edison vs Christy Butcher / Lisa Edwards1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeth Kimche / Karin Egan vs Angie Baggett / Amy Engleman2-6, 6-7
2025-02-02vs Shrewsbury-TopslLost 13
L#1 DoublesCatherine Morgan / MISSY HANNAHAN vs Anne Johnson / Virginia Ballard1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJamie Lynn vs Jamie Shrewsbury6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Kimche / Stephanie Wiesel vs Shellie Rowe / Lydia Casey4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrittany Tarver / Allison Page vs Rita Myler / Shawn Dishman7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-01-26vs Halstead-Camp CreekSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJulie Martin / Debbie Watson vs Christine Davidson / Marci Knauss4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJamie Lynn vs Jen Brady6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Morgan / Karin Egan vs Carrie Halstead / Jennifer Hernandez5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrett Peterson / Cindy Krutz vs Heather Cooper / Deanna Hibbard6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
MISSY HANNAHAN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Debbie Watson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Jamie Lynn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Sterling Edison
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Cindy Krutz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Diana Kish
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Catherine Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Beth Kimche
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Karin Egan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Brittany Tarver
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.91
Nicole Rogers
published
2.85
Tracey McGuire
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Stephanie Wiesel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karin Egan + Catherine Morgan134 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Watson + MISSY HANNAHAN303 matchesnot enough data
MISSY HANNAHAN + Catherine Morgan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MISSY HANNAHAN
12W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Debbie Watson
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Jamie Lynn
13W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Sterling Edison
30W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Cindy Krutz
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Diana Kish
2W–5L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Catherine Morgan
9W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Beth Kimche
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Karin Egan
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Brittany Tarver
31W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Nicole Rogers
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Tracey McGuire
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.85
Stephanie Wiesel
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.