Teams

Butcher-Sandestin

2025 OWB Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-13vs Halstead-Camp CreekWon 30
W#1 DoublesShannon Widman / Tessa Bryan vs Valerie Collier / Kristine Cox4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngie Baggett / Amy Engleman vs Carrie Halstead / Donna Capozzoli6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTawny Tapp / Vera Michailidis vs Deanna Hibbard / Heather Cooper6-1, 6-4
2025-04-06vs Shrewsbury-TopslSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAngie Baggett / Amy Engleman vs Virginia Ballard / Cindy White4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesShannon Widman vs Jamie Shrewsbury3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristy Butcher / Stephanie Buckner vs Anne Johnson / Lydia Casey5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHelen Collias / Tawny Tapp vs Rita Myler / Jodie Phillips7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2025-04-04vs Shrewsbury-TopslLost 13
L#1 DoublesAngie Baggett / Amy Engleman vs Cindy White / Virginia Ballard4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAmanda Sills vs Jamie Shrewsbury6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChristy Butcher / Tessa Bryan vs Anne Johnson / Lydia Casey6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Jefcoat / Erin Clayton vs Rita Myler / Silvia Madriaga6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-03-16vs Halstead-Camp CreekWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristy Butcher / Kristine Kenworthy vs Tiffany Harran / Christine Davidson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Engleman / Amanda Sills vs Deanna Hibbard / Jen Brady7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesErin Clayton / Vera Michailidis vs Carrie Halstead / Jennifer Hernandez6-1, 6-2
2025-03-13vs OWB/Gibson/40&Over3.5WLost 13
L#1 DoublesChristy Butcher / Helen Collias vs Michelle Asbell / Laurie Brown2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMandi Skinner vs Nicole Perkins4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesErin Clayton / Lisa Edwards vs Kim Baynes / Carol Block1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAngie Baggett / Kristine Kenworthy vs Kim Lepley / Sherri Marsteller6-1, 7-6
2025-02-09vs Morgan-WatersoundSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHelen Collias / Tessa Bryan vs MISSY HANNAHAN / Debbie Watson2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMandi Skinner vs Jamie Lynn3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristy Butcher / Lisa Edwards vs Diana Kish / Sterling Edison6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngie Baggett / Amy Engleman vs Beth Kimche / Karin Egan6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Angie Baggett
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Stephanie Buckner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Amanda Sills
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Tessa Bryan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Cindy Jefcoat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Vera Michailidis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Christy Butcher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Mandi Skinner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.20
Amy Engleman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Shannon Widman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Lisa Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Tawny Tapp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Erin Clayton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Helen Collias
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kristine Kenworthy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lizzy van Cleave
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Baggett + Amy Engleman3353% games+7.7% vs expected
Christy Butcher + Stephanie Buckner224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angie Baggett
7W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Stephanie Buckner
11W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Amanda Sills
21W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Tessa Bryan
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Cindy Jefcoat
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Vera Michailidis
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Christy Butcher
13W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Mandi Skinner
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Amy Engleman
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Shannon Widman
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Lisa Edwards
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Tawny Tapp
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Erin Clayton
1W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Helen Collias
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristine Kenworthy
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lizzy van Cleave
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.