Teams

ABroemel (Queens)

2025-2026 Winter Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 3.5 Women Doubles; Evening

5 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-11vs APurmort (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnnie Hart / Kait Beck vs Danielle Gier / Sally Licandro3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-08vs JSmith (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesStacy Melton / Kait Beck vs Stacy Andrews / Kimberly Rupnarine1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-01-07vs KHeidkamp (PCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTiffany Schenberger / Kait Beck vs Kristin Heidkamp / Christine Leavitt6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-12-21vs AMacMurphy (PPRSC); Heavy HittersLost 01
L#1 DoublesTiffany Schenberger / Annie Hart vs Angela MacMurphy / Mindy Zimmerman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-12-13vs PReimann/KMacrone (Matthews)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Broemel / Stacy Melton vs Connie Arevalo / Kate MacRone6-3, 7-6
2025-11-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Schenberger / Kait Beck vs Joanne Lee / Julie Moore6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-14vs TInga (Life Time); CougarsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Broemel / Stacy Melton vs Tania Inga / Avani Bhamidipati7-6, 6-1
2025-11-04vs SGrindle (WSRC); Frosty ServeLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Broemel / Kait Beck vs Scarlet Grindle / Amy Barrett5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Doubles; Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Tiffany Schenberger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Stacy Melton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Annie Hart
published 3
2.91
Kait Beck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Allison Broemel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Broemel + Stacy Melton5750% games+4.2% vs expected
Allison Broemel + Kait Beck91446% games+4.2% vs expected
Kait Beck + Tiffany Schenberger2350% games−0.6% vs expected
Allison Broemel + Tiffany Schenberger314 matchesnot enough data
Kait Beck + Stacy Melton134 matchesnot enough data
Annie Hart + Tiffany Schenberger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tiffany Schenberger
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Stacy Melton
15W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
3
Annie Hart
11W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Kait Beck
45W–69L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Allison Broemel
67W–92L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.