Teams

Thomas - NC- Oxford

2025 Adult 40&Over-NC · Women 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.33 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Women 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Thomas - NC- Oxford000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Dana Bray
published 4.5
4.07
Abby Flowers
published 4.5
4.01
Shannon McCalla
published
3.98
Hala Hakim
published 4.5
3.84
Caitlin Thomas
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.82
Aimee Gregg
published 4.5
3.51
Claire Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
Marta Panickar
published
Shelly Shows
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon McCalla + Dana Bray2350% games+4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Bray
40W–26L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Abby Flowers
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
Shannon McCalla
39W–30L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
Hala Hakim
19W–19L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Caitlin Thomas
63W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
4.5
Aimee Gregg
14W–17L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.82
4
Claire Fowler
60W–41L career · 6 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
Marta Panickar
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelly Shows
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.