Teams

The Fireblasters

2026 USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 3.78 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-15vs UntouchaballsLost 01
L#3 DoublesAshley McPeak / Eliott McPeak vs Ryan Stewart / Brijean Brennan7-6, 1-0
2026-03-08vs TennisityWon 10
W#3 DoublesOwen McPeak / Ashley McPeak vs Christeena Sevy / Ryan Cook6-2, 6-3
2026-02-28vs Unforced ErrorsLost 01
L#2 DoublesTodd McPeak / Ashley McPeak vs Spencer Woods / Averi Lopez3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1In All the Way9226720230
2Dirty Love9226720244
3PTSA 8.074201330284
4The Fireblasters65171640301
5Mixed Hitters38102351350
6Tennisity29102347326
7Mixed Marvels29102350346
8MSA 8.0 (Mas Serve Aces)2982554345

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Lori Griffel
published
3.98
Adrienne Idsal
published 4
3.97
Heather Baird
published 4
3.90
Owen McPeak
published 4
3.87
Lucy Merrick
published
3.84
Eliott McPeak
published 4
3.75
Jonas Griffel
published 4
3.44
Jessika Hulewsky
published 3.5
3.27
Luke Felt
published 3.5
3.25
Ashley McPeak
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
William Merrick
published 3.5
Todd McPeak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonas Griffel + Adrienne Idsal4156% games+0.0% vs expected
Eliott McPeak + Heather Baird4165% gamesnot enough data
Lori Griffel + Jonas Griffel134 matchesnot enough data
Lucy Merrick + William Merrick134 matchesnot enough data
Lori Griffel + Luke Felt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Griffel
24W–31L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Adrienne Idsal
43W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Heather Baird
168W–86L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Owen McPeak
14W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Lucy Merrick
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.87
4
Eliott McPeak
7W–8L career · type D · no lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Jonas Griffel
15W–9L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Jessika Hulewsky
76W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Luke Felt
101W–105L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Ashley McPeak
1W–5L career · type M · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
William Merrick
83W–58L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
Todd McPeak
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.