Teams

In All the Way

2026 USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

19 players · average NTRP 3.97 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1In All the Way9226720230
2Dirty Love9226720244
3PTSA 8.074201330284
4The Fireblasters65171640301
5Mixed Hitters38102351350
6Tennisity29102347326
7Mixed Marvels29102350346
8MSA 8.0 (Mas Serve Aces)2982554345

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Alex Wong
published 4.5
4.50
Kevin Jay
published 4.5
4.33
Mark Graham
published 4.5
4.22
Shelley Ware
published 4.5
4.11
Justin Walker
published 4.5
4.09
Jami Garver
published 4.5
4.09
Jacob Roberts
published 4
3.98
John Perry
published 4
3.94
3.93
Brian Johnson
published 4
3.61
Colleen Schoeck
published 4
3.56
Bob Haycock
published 3.5
3.52
Stacia Albiston
published 3.5
3.49
Chadd Cripe
published 3.5
3.48
Erin Perry
published 4
3.47
Stacey Walker
published 3.5
3.43
Jane Perlaky
published 3.5
3.37
Tiffany Roberts
published 3.5
3.26
Kiley Holt
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacob Roberts + Tiffany Roberts11163% games+7.4% vs expected
Brian Johnson + Stacey Walker6160% games+4.5% vs expected
Erin Perry + John Perry51245% games−4.1% vs expected
Bob Haycock + Shelley Ware2443% games−15.3% vs expected
Brian Johnson + Anne Marie Carlisle4157% gamesnot enough data
Stacey Walker + Bob Haycock4164% gamesnot enough data
Justin Walker + Stacey Walker134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Perlaky + Alex Wong404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alex Wong
181W–55L career · no lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
4.59
4.5
Kevin Jay
42W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.50
4.5
Mark Graham
130W–63L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Shelley Ware
144W–92L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Justin Walker
86W–63L career · no lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
4.11
4.5
Jami Garver
59W–49L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
4
Jacob Roberts
91W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
4.09
4
John Perry
186W–122L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Anne Marie Carlisle
51W–41L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Brian Johnson
207W–115L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Colleen Schoeck
125W–66L career · no lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Bob Haycock
128W–78L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Stacia Albiston
59W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Chadd Cripe
182W–98L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
4
Erin Perry
68W–102L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Stacey Walker
72W–53L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Jane Perlaky
145W–183L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Tiffany Roberts
59W–43L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Kiley Holt
43W–65L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.