Teams

PTSA 8.0

2026 USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

20 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1In All the Way9226720230
2Dirty Love9226720244
3PTSA 8.074201330284
4The Fireblasters65171640301
5Mixed Hitters38102351350
6Tennisity29102347326
7Mixed Marvels29102350346
8MSA 8.0 (Mas Serve Aces)2982554345

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Chad Vaughn
published 4.5
4.17
Pratap Murali
published 4.5
4.11
Alex Conilogue
published 4.5
4.09
Anya Sandusky
published 4
4.09
Maji Daines
published 4.5
4.05
Vanessa Almaraz
published 4.5
4.02
Dana Gross
published 4.5
4.00
Robert Miranda
published 4
3.91
3.87
Suzanna Murali
published 4
3.77
Bryan Escobedo
published 4
3.69
Jeffrey Pugsley
published 4
3.65
Cory Mecham
published 4
3.57
Decker Rolph
published 3.5
3.48
Albert Kang
published 3.5
3.47
Megan Whitlock
published
3.42
Dawn Crochet
published 3.5
3.35
Chris Culig
published 3.5
3.35
Lindsey Cassidy
published 3.5
3.25
Terri Wippel
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Koppenhafer + Pratap Murali8169% games+15.8% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Robert Miranda17858% games+0.6% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Pratap Murali161849% games−3.4% vs expected
Chris Culig + Dawn Crochet152246% games−7.7% vs expected
Chad Vaughn + Suzanna Murali7653% gamesnot enough data
Robert Miranda + Dawn Crochet4252% gamesnot enough data
Anya Sandusky + Bryan Escobedo314 matchesnot enough data
Suzanna Murali + Chris Culig224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chad Vaughn
65W–29L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
4.38
4.5
Pratap Murali
99W–69L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Alex Conilogue
36W–31L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.11
4
Anya Sandusky
211W–108L career · no lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
4.09
4.5
Maji Daines
163W–74L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Vanessa Almaraz
106W–105L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Dana Gross
73W–68L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Robert Miranda
241W–112L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Leslie Koppenhafer
265W–130L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Suzanna Murali
297W–165L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Bryan Escobedo
93W–79L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Jeffrey Pugsley
69W–56L career · type A · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Cory Mecham
62W–54L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Decker Rolph
18W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Albert Kang
35W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Megan Whitlock
5W–30L career · no lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Dawn Crochet
170W–181L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Chris Culig
106W–89L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Lindsey Cassidy
111W–79L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Terri Wippel
155W–138L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.