Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Young/Swensen

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.96 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-08vs Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/HronekWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Cooley / Christine Fotheringham vs Rachel Labrum / Heather Probst3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlisa Gardner vs Kalee King6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Earl / Jessica Gardner vs Amber Greenwood / Carly Reese6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-08-01vs Sunpro-Warren/CarterWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Fotheringham / Julie Cooley vs Megan Warren / Sue Smith6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAlisa Gardner vs Lindsey Ramage6-0, 6-0
2024-07-25vs Sports Mall-Ellis/DowDellLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Earl / Christine Fotheringham vs Staci McCubbins / Jennifer Rasmussen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlisa Gardner vs Alyson Ellis6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDeanne Goaslind / Catherine Lever vs AMANDA NEFF / Pamela Roberts2-6, 1-6
2024-07-12Won 20
W#1 SinglesAmy Earl vs Cristie Briggs6-4, 2-0
W#2 DoublesJessica Gardner / Christine Fotheringham vs Stacie Johnson / Crystel Fox6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-11vs Sunpro-Hall/BurdgeWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Cooley / Christine Fotheringham vs Amy Rees / Staci Leishman6-4, 6-1
2024-06-27vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKim Cronin / Mindy Dunyon vs Susel Weight / Marcela Pomadoro5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJessica Gardner / Deanne Goaslind vs Teresa Polistina / Sherree Greenhalgh6-3, 6-2
2024-06-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Fotheringham / Mindy Dunyon vs JaNae Smith / Regina Johnson6-0, 6-1
2024-06-13vs Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/HronekWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Earl / Christine Fotheringham vs Deyce Peterson / Heather Probst7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAlisa Gardner vs Jessica Schulz7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDalynn Thomas / Deanne Goaslind vs Amber Greenwood / Carly Reese2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Christine Fotheringham
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
3.99
Julie Cooley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Alisa Gardner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Catherine Lever
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Dalynn Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.75
Amy Earl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Kim Cronin
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Chandi Hurd
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.67
Mindy Dunyon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Emily Benton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.65
Deanne Goaslind
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Katie Swensen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Jessica Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Gretel Sampson
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.26
Alena Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Swensen + Christine Fotheringham6080% games+19.3% vs expected
Gretel Sampson + Alisa Gardner11366% games+14.1% vs expected
Amy Earl + Kim Cronin4262% games+14.0% vs expected
Amy Earl + Alisa Gardner19369% games+11.7% vs expected
Kim Cronin + Alisa Gardner14068% games+11.4% vs expected
Alisa Gardner + Christine Fotheringham14562% games+10.5% vs expected
Jessica Gardner + Alisa Gardner8160% games+10.1% vs expected
Emily Benton + Alisa Gardner11266% games+9.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christine Fotheringham
213W–62L career · 7 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
4.14
Julie Cooley
63W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Alisa Gardner
197W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Catherine Lever
40W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Dalynn Thomas
77W–68L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Amy Earl
108W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Kim Cronin
380W–238L career · 9 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Chandi Hurd
183W–142L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Mindy Dunyon
121W–85L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.67
4
Emily Benton
148W–120L career · 8 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Deanne Goaslind
62W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
Katie Swensen
102W–84L career · 4 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jessica Gardner
81W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Gretel Sampson
200W–198L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Alena Taylor
174W–200L career · 10 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.