Teams

Apollo Beach Volley Girls - M. Speidel

2025 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-16vs Arbor Greene Emeralds - S. FrisinaLost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hanlon / Michelle Graba vs Stacy Leatherman / Francesca LoMonaco6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesRuby Sanders vs Jennifer Wittenbauer4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Speidel / Autumn Waters vs Michele Curtin / Lisa Lalis6-7
W#1 DoublesLiza Geist / Elizabeth Hanlon vs Kelley Sadlowski / Molly James6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMelissa Speidel / Ruby Sanders vs Sarah Boe / Jennifer Berk1-6, 1-6
2025-04-29vs Cheval - J. HurleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hanlon / Liza Geist vs Barbara Ingham / Dhara Patel7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKim Sverdlow vs Heather Warren6-0, 6-0
2025-04-25vs PC Overserved - C. EicholtzLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hanlon / Ruby Sanders vs Erin Rolle / Susanna Bray0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesLiza Geist vs Ashley Reiss6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Speidel / Michelle Binder vs Ashley Terry / Laurie Daigle3-6, 1-6
2025-04-18vs RH Sugar and Slice - C. CoyleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Speidel / Michelle Graba vs Kristin Rowe / Susan Wade6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLiza Geist vs Carrie Renter0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Kim Sverdlow
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.50
Liza Geist
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.21
Michelle Graba
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.18
Elizabeth Hanlon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Melissa Speidel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.07
Ruby Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.06
Autumn Waters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.00
Michelle Binder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Hanlon + Melissa Speidel3252% games+1.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Hanlon + Liza Geist404 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Graba + Melissa Speidel134 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Hanlon + Ruby Sanders123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Graba + Michelle Binder033 matchesnot enough data
Ruby Sanders + Michelle Binder033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Sverdlow
21W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
Liza Geist
14W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%50%50%
2.50
Michelle Graba
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Elizabeth Hanlon
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Melissa Speidel
8W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Ruby Sanders
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
2.5
Autumn Waters
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Michelle Binder
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.