Teams

Kumar/Nashville

2024 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.5, 3.0. 2.5 Women Thursday AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5, 3.0. 2.5 Women Thursday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Katie Feyes
published
3.73
Briana Mullenax
published 4
3.62
Brenda Eckhart
published 4
3.48
Heather Brandon
published
3.34
Jennifer Knight
published
3.34
Nina Kumar
published
3.17
3.13
Jenny Neeley
published
2.90
Elisa Hill
published
2.89
Megan McGinness
published
2.86
Megan de la O
published
2.80
Jill Labetti
published
Andrea Madson
published 3
2.70
Rachel Walker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Knight + Brenda Eckhart7453% games+12.8% vs expected
Megan de la O + Traci Gilbert-Stafford9850% games+0.4% vs expected
Jenny Neeley + Heather Brandon7353% games−1.1% vs expected
Nina Kumar + Elisa Hill2357% gamesnot enough data
Heather Brandon + Traci Gilbert-Stafford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Feyes
24W–20L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Briana Mullenax
23W–13L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Brenda Eckhart
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.62
Heather Brandon
24W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.48
Jennifer Knight
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Nina Kumar
36W–40L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Traci Gilbert-Stafford
32W–34L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.17
Jenny Neeley
16W–26L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Elisa Hill
25W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
Megan McGinness
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Megan de la O
21W–20L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
Jill Labetti
19W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Andrea Madson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Anna Morgan Crawford
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachel Walker
16W–19L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.