Teams

Pool/Berlin 3.0 18 Fri

2023 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.0 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Molly Norris
published
3.31
Stacey Russo
published
3.29
Jen Berlin
published
3.19
Jeanie Reynolds
published
3.16
Amy Bunch
published 3.5
3.13
Allison Pool
published 3.5
2.96
Tamieka Howell
published
2.88
2.86
Susan Causey
published
2.74
Evie Curley
published 3
2.50
Lourdes Elder
published
2.33
Kaye Ferree
published
Spring Walsh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Norris + Stacey Russo7261% games+10.2% vs expected
Allison Pool + Jen Berlin2440% games−2.1% vs expected
Molly Norris + Jen Berlin4248% gamesnot enough data
Lourdes Elder + Susan Causey134 matchesnot enough data
Jeanie Reynolds + Allison Pool224 matchesnot enough data
Jeanie Reynolds + Amy Bunch303 matchesnot enough data
Jeanie Reynolds + Jen Berlin213 matchesnot enough data
Jeanie Reynolds + Caroline DeVillers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Norris
19W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
Stacey Russo
21W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Jen Berlin
22W–25L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Jeanie Reynolds
38W–27L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Amy Bunch
31W–36L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Allison Pool
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
Tamieka Howell
20W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Caroline DeVillers
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
Susan Causey
2W–17L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
2.86
3
Evie Curley
22W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Lourdes Elder
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Kaye Ferree
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
2.33
Spring Walsh
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.