Teams

CMTA @ Liberty Park-Woodbury

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over · 9.0W

11 players · average NTRP 4.40 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-30vs Ivory Ridge-HydeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJane McQuade / Ann Phillips vs Lori Keenan / Winifred Rawstorne7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPauline Armstrong / Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury vs Michelle Hyde / Tracy Derby7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2021-06-23vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-RawlingsLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatrice Duvernay / Susan Ellison vs Debra Rawlings / Randi Welch3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane McQuade / Ann Phillips vs Janine Petersen / Julie DeLong4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMarcia Foote / Martsie Earl vs Diana Granger / Kim Levine4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-09vs Ivory Ridge-HydeWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Ellison / Patrice Duvernay vs Debbie Moody / Melissa Auxier6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLynn Kokkola-Woodbury / Pauline Armstrong vs Teresa Harris / Michelle Hyde6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnn Phillips / Jane McQuade vs Tracy Derby / Lori Keenan6-4, 6-1
2021-06-02vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-RawlingsWon 20
W#2 DoublesJane McQuade / Ann Phillips vs Janine Petersen / Julie DeLong5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatrice Duvernay / Marcia Foote vs Debra Rawlings / Lisa Smith4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-05-19vs Ivory Ridge-HydeLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatrice Duvernay / Susan Ellison vs Teresa Harris / Winifred Rawstorne2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStacey Maxfield / Carlene Kemp vs Tracy Derby / Denise Norman3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLynn Kokkola-Woodbury / Pauline Armstrong vs Lisa Mayberry / Sue Curtis6-3, 6-4
2021-05-12vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-RawlingsWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarcia Foote / Susan Ellison vs Kim Levine / Janine Petersen6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJane McQuade / Pauline Armstrong vs Diane Congdon / Randi Welch6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPatrice Duvernay / Martsie Earl vs Linda Marz / Lynette Duran6-4, 7-6
2020-08-05vs Ivory Ridge-HydeSplit 11
L#2 DoublesStacey Maxfield / Massae Sato MacIunas vs Michelle Hyde / Sue Curtis3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Ellison / Patrice Duvernay vs Lori Keenan / Debbie Moody6-1, 6-2
2020-07-01vs Ivory Ridge-HydeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLynn Kokkola-Woodbury / Marcia Foote vs Tracy Derby / Debbie Moody1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSusan Ellison / Patrice Duvernay vs Lisa Mayberry / Teresa Harris6-2, 6-1
2020-06-10vs Ivory Ridge-HydeWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatrice Duvernay / Susan Ellison vs Lisa Mayberry / Tracy Derby7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnn Phillips / Jane McQuade vs Michelle Hyde / Lori Keenan6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMarcia Foote / Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury vs Sue Curtis / Melissa Auxier4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Patrice Duvernay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Jane McQuade
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.97
Ann Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.82
Carlene Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.62
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Marcia Foote
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Martsie Earl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
PJ Wimmer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Pauline Armstrong
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Stacey Maxfield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Ellison
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane McQuade + Patrice Duvernay8160% games+7.1% vs expected
Jane McQuade + Ann Phillips584453% games−0.4% vs expected
Susan Ellison + Patrice Duvernay6362% games−0.7% vs expected
Jane McQuade + Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury10749% games−4.4% vs expected
Stacey Maxfield + Susan Ellison2441% games−13.4% vs expected
Susan Ellison + Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury3945% gamesnot enough data
PJ Wimmer + Jane McQuade3356% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury + Ann Phillips134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Patrice Duvernay
144W–72L career · 8 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Jane McQuade
267W–181L career · 10 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Ann Phillips
78W–63L career · 5 lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
3.97
4.5
Carlene Kemp
58W–195L career · 5 lines in 2021
92%8%<1%
3.82
4
Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury
78W–137L career · 7 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.62
Marcia Foote
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Martsie Earl
40W–50L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
PJ Wimmer
5W–8L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Pauline Armstrong
53W–24L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stacey Maxfield
12W–25L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Ellison
31W–46L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.