Teams

KG:Kelly:Kelly

2022 Cape Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women Fit 1

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-25vs MCAC:True Blues:HoaglandWon 20
W#2 DoublesAllison Todoroff / Kathleen Lewis vs Jeannette Cooper / Margaret Russell6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMelinda Beggan / Sabina Troy vs Margaret Ekholm / Amy Peacock7-5, 3-1
2022-07-18vs MCAC:Winter LVs:White/HarrisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAllison Todoroff / Jean McCutcheon vs Patricia Cronin / Paula Casey6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSabina Troy / Melinda Beggan vs Allison Whalen / Elizabeth Callahan6-7, 1-2
2022-07-01vs MCAC:Summer LVs:White/HarrisWon 21
L#1 DoublesAllison Todoroff / Suzanne Turo vs Jeanne Bissonnette / Emily Kissell4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKate Gaffney / Tina Cummings vs Margaret Lovelette / Paula Casey6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJean McCutcheon / Sabina Troy vs Marjorie White / Tina Leardi2-6, 5-3, 1-0
2022-06-20vs MCAC:True Blues:HoaglandWon 30
W#1 DoublesKate Gaffney / Allison Todoroff vs Joyce Taber / Nancy Whitehurst7-5, 4-3
W#2 DoublesElsbeth Rowaan / Estelle Colgan vs Elizabeth Doriss / Amy Peacock6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMelinda Beggan / Kathleen Lewis vs Polly Brazelton / Jeannette Cooper6-1, 7-5
2022-06-13vs MCAC:Summer LVs:White/HarrisWon 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Turo / Allison Todoroff vs Jeanne Bissonnette / Emily Kissell3-6, 4-5
W#2 DoublesElsbeth Rowaan / Estelle Colgan vs Tracey Gardella / Kelly ORourke6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKate Gaffney / Tina Cummings vs Kathleen Davin / Tina Leardi4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-06-06vs MCAC:True Blues:HoaglandWon 21
W#1 DoublesElsbeth Rowaan / Estelle Colgan vs Joyce Taber / Nancy Whitehurst6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTina Cummings / Suzanne Turo vs Kristina Mousseau / Jeannette Cooper6-7, 2-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathleen Lewis / Jean McCutcheon vs Margaret Ekholm / Margaret Russell6-3, 6-0
2022-05-23vs MCAC:Summer LVs:White/HarrisWon 21
L#1 DoublesTina Cummings / Allison Todoroff vs Jeanne Bissonnette / Emily Kissell1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEstelle Colgan / Elsbeth Rowaan vs Marjorie White / Paula Casey6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathleen Lewis / Kate Gaffney vs Tina Leardi / Allison Whalen6-2, 6-1
2022-05-16vs MCAC:True Blues:HoaglandWon 21
L#1 DoublesTina Cummings / Allison Todoroff vs Kristina Mousseau / Joyce Taber6-7, 2-3
W#2 DoublesElsbeth Rowaan / Estelle Colgan vs Jeannette Cooper / Diane Leather6-3, 5-4
W#3 DoublesKate Gaffney / Melinda Beggan vs Polly Brazelton / Amy Peacock6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Women Fit 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KG:Kelly:Kelly8017719177
2MCAC:Summer LVs:White/Harris44131124192

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Elsbeth Rowaan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.48
Diane Cahill
published 4
Allison Todoroff
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Estelle Colgan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Cynthia Kelly
published
Jean McCutcheon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kate Gaffney
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Kathleen Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Melinda Beggan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rhonda Snow
published
Sabina Troy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Turo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tina Cummings
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elsbeth Rowaan + Estelle Colgan5065% gamesnot enough data
Kate Gaffney + Allison Todoroff5062% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Turo + Tina Cummings134 matchesnot enough data
Jean McCutcheon + Allison Todoroff224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elsbeth Rowaan
23W–14L career · 8 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.62
4
Diane Cahill
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Allison Todoroff
13W–23L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Estelle Colgan
9W–12L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Cynthia Kelly
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jean McCutcheon
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kate Gaffney
16W–2L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Lewis
18W–5L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melinda Beggan
33W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rhonda Snow
39W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sabina Troy
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Turo
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tina Cummings
12W–18L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.