Teams

TDC-Long

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-12vs Hermitage- WiertelLost 01
L#1 DoublesJustine Sherman / Annette Vignone vs Andrea Wassmer / Lisa Frazier5-7, 4-6
2024-06-05vs Raintree- LloydWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustine Sherman / Heidi Collier vs Mona Stahling / Lisa Penny6-3, 6-3
2024-05-31vs SCC CacciottiLost 01
L#1 DoublesJustine Sherman / Heidi Collier vs Sarah Boyd / Morgan Schwartz3-6, 3-6
2024-05-29vs KRA Fleck/WalekLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheri Carlyle / Heidi Collier vs Sara Winterhoff / Katherine Fleck6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-24vs Twin Hickory YuLost 02
L#1 DoublesJustine Sherman / Michele Limoges vs Holly Hamilton / Uma Maheswari Subramaniam4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnnette Vignone / Heidi Collier vs Jennifer Schwarz / Laura Armour6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2024-05-22vs Burkwood CookWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustine Sherman / Heidi Collier vs Kathy Didlake / Tara Sobel3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-21vs ACAC NaylorWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustine Sherman / Annette Vignone vs Kathie Naylor / Rebecca Wong7-5, 3-3
2024-05-17vs Westwood Combs-PokrywkaLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Collier / Sheri Carlyle vs Rose Yuen / Heather Harker3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Justine Sherman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Heidi Collier
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.26
Sharon Moorefield
published
3.16
Cynthia Mistretta
published 3.5
3.12
Sheri Carlyle
published
3.05
Michele Limoges
published
3.04
Annette Vignone
published 3.5
2.87
Eliza Causey
published
2.71
Becky Harper
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Collier + Justine Sherman201255% games+5.6% vs expected
Sheri Carlyle + Heidi Collier404 matchesnot enough data
Sheri Carlyle + Michele Limoges123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Justine Sherman
89W–60L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Heidi Collier
118W–81L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Sharon Moorefield
19W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Cynthia Mistretta
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Sheri Carlyle
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.12
Michele Limoges
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
3.5
Annette Vignone
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Eliza Causey
21W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Becky Harper
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.