Teams

WP GREEN

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-17vs CP WHITEWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMegan Gunden / Marina Sterngold vs Camille Reuter / Natalie Duncan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-10vs BP NAVYLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesMichela Zafferani vs Samantha Baldwin6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-07-03vs WP NAVYSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesCasey Thomas / Marina Sterngold vs Madeline Robertson / Julia Dunn6-3, 6-3
L#1 Female SinglesMegan Gunden vs Cynthia Lopez3-6, 6-7
2025-06-30vs BP NAVYWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesMichela Zafferani vs Katherine Moriarty6-4, 6-1
2025-06-25vs SKY NAVYWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMarina Sterngold / Rachel Williams vs Sarah Bailey / Mallory Cleveland6-2, 6-0
2025-06-19vs CHCC REDLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesMarina Sterngold / Laura Wasserman vs Kelsey Cullen / Niki Goldberg4-6, 2-6
W#1 Female SinglesMichela Zafferani vs Michaela Redlingshafer6-2, 6-3
L#2 Female SinglesMegan Gunden vs Kate Hanson2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PRKR NAVY339920152
2RRTC SILVER3381023162
3WP GREEN2471125170

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Casey Thomas
published 4
3.60
Michela Zafferani
usually #1 Female Singles 100% · published 4
3.52
Rachel Williams
published
3.46
Laura Wasserman
published
3.44
Megan Gunden
usually #2 Female Singles 33%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Marina Sterngold
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Audrey Hamilton
published 3.5
3.21
Shereen Sairafi
published
3.11
Aubrey Siegel
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Wasserman + Rachel Williams13461% games+8.4% vs expected
Marina Sterngold + Megan Gunden7454% games+5.7% vs expected
Audrey Hamilton + Rachel Williams314 matchesnot enough data
Michela Zafferani + Megan Gunden404 matchesnot enough data
Marina Sterngold + Audrey Hamilton303 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Hamilton + Laura Wasserman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Casey Thomas
35W–12L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Michela Zafferani
101W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Rachel Williams
35W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Laura Wasserman
30W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Megan Gunden
106W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Marina Sterngold
68W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Audrey Hamilton
29W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Shereen Sairafi
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Aubrey Siegel
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.