Teams

CP WHITE

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-15Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesSarah Lessner / Camille Reuter vs Taylor Bell / Melissa Haynes6-1, 6-3
2025-07-10vs SKY NAVYSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesSarah Lessner / Erika Wangeman vs Mallory Cleveland / Allison Helms7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 Female SinglesNohemi Almaraz vs Lilly Cleveland6-3, 6-4
2025-06-26vs CHCC REDLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesSarah Lessner / Lindsey Martin vs Kate Hanson / Ashley Peterson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-25vs SKY NAVYWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesNohemi Almaraz / Sierra Fox vs Mallory Cleveland / Lilly Cleveland7-6, 6-2
W#1 Female SinglesErika Wangeman vs Sarah Melberg4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 Female SinglesSarah Lessner vs Sarah Bailey4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-19vs WP NAVYWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesNohemi Almaraz / Erika Wangeman vs Emily McMahon / Jessica Friedrich7-6, 6-4
2025-06-12vs WP GREENWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesSarah Lessner / Lindsey Martin vs Laura Wasserman / Rachel Williams2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CHCC RED7017412136
2GAC GOLD60153794
3WP NAVY5214715142
4TTA BLUE4210820176
5GR PURPLE3371122186
6MC TEAL2481021159
7BP GREEN2471123172
8LEBTC BLUE2481024187
9CP WHITE25101125199
10SKY NAVY2541736234
11SS-H ORANGE1561226181
12BP NAVY1661531207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Nohemi Almaraz
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.56
Lauren Flynn
published
3.32
Erika Wangeman
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Sarah Lessner
usually #1 Female Doubles 80%, also #2 Female Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Camille Reuter
published 3.5
3.02
Natalie Duncan
published
Lindsey Martin
published
Sierra Fox
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nohemi Almaraz
71W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.58
Lauren Flynn
27W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Erika Wangeman
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Sarah Lessner
30W–38L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Camille Reuter
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Natalie Duncan
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Lindsey Martin
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sierra Fox
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.