Teams

SS-H ORANGE

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-10vs GR PURPLELost 01
L#1 Female DoublesPaige Giltner / Karlie Boone vs EMILY JENNINGS / Catherine Hosteny4-6, 6-7
2025-07-03vs GAC GOLDLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesKarlie Boone / Kiki Faircloth vs Lauren Hanzlik / Madeline Luttrell0-6, 3-6
2025-06-26vs LEBTC BLUELost 01
L#2 Female SinglesKiki Faircloth vs Vanessa Parsons7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-19vs GR PURPLEWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesKiki Faircloth vs Jordan Ziolkowski7-5, 6-1
2025-06-12Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesKiki Faircloth / Karlie Boone vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CHCC RED7017412136
2GAC GOLD60153794
3WP NAVY5214715142
4TTA BLUE4210820176
5GR PURPLE3371122186
6MC TEAL2481021159
7BP GREEN2471123172
8LEBTC BLUE2481024187
9CP WHITE25101125199
10SKY NAVY2541736234
11SS-H ORANGE1561226181
12BP NAVY1661531207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Kiki Faircloth
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Abby Butt
published 3.5
Becca Rinn
published 3.5
3.03
Brittany Norris
published 3.5
2.75
Karlie Boone
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
Bailey Taber
published 3
Paige Giltner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karlie Boone + Brittany Norris4157% games+13.6% vs expected
Brittany Norris + Kiki Faircloth6262% games+12.0% vs expected
Karlie Boone + Kiki Faircloth314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kiki Faircloth
42W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Abby Butt
23W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Becca Rinn
52W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Brittany Norris
25W–25L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Karlie Boone
31W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Bailey Taber
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paige Giltner
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.