Teams

CHCC RED

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-17Won 10
W#2 Female SinglesMaggie Dornseif vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-10vs WP NAVYWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMaggie Dornseif / Michaela Redlingshafer vs Julia Dunn / Carolyn Welter6-2, 7-6
2025-07-03vs SKY NAVYWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesKelsey Cullen / Kate Hanson vs Mallory Cleveland / Sarah Bailey6-2, 7-5
2025-06-26vs CP WHITEWon 10
W#2 Female SinglesMaggie Dornseif vs Natalie Duncan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-19vs WP GREENWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesKelsey Cullen / Niki Goldberg vs Marina Sterngold / Laura Wasserman6-4, 6-2
2025-06-12vs BP NAVYWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesKelsey Cullen / Niki Goldberg vs Lauren Villaverde / Lucia Rowe6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CHCC RED7017412136
2GAC GOLD60153794
3WP NAVY5214715142
4TTA BLUE4210820176
5GR PURPLE3371122186
6MC TEAL2481021159
7BP GREEN2471123172
8LEBTC BLUE2481024187
9CP WHITE25101125199
10SKY NAVY2541736234
11SS-H ORANGE1561226181
12BP NAVY1661531207

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
3.47
Kelsey Cullen
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Maggie Dornseif
usually #2 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Kate Hanson
published
3.40
Jessica Tarangioli
published
3.36
Niki Goldberg
published
Ashley Peterson
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michaela Redlingshafer
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Kelsey Cullen
42W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Maggie Dornseif
47W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Kate Hanson
25W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jessica Tarangioli
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Niki Goldberg
18W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Ashley Peterson
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.