Teams

Olde Cypress - Navarro

2023 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-07vs Marco YMCA - HeiseLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristen Catino / Shelley Boggess vs Bernadette DiPino / Susanna Haedelt3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAggie Rupert / Lori Caple vs Mary Milchanowski / Stacy Faremouth2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Nancy Inglese vs Jacqueline Heise / Stephanie Opel2-6, 5-7
2023-03-01vs Pelican Marsh - BargerWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristen Catino / Shelley Boggess vs Marie Shoaf / Kristine Laterra6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLori Coates / Kathleen Farmer vs Shelly-Jo Shuman / Anne Mortillaro6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCheryl Toth / Tina Albright vs Debra Bowenkamp / Kimberly Taylor6-3, 6-1
2023-02-21vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkLost 12
L#1 SinglesMinde Shinnick vs Marketa Dieckmann4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Shelley Boggess vs Marian Jacobson / Marie France McCloskey1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori Coates / Tina Albright vs Gretchen Landolt / Hillary Cooper4-6, 2-6
2023-02-07vs World Tennis Club - LaveryLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Coates / Minde Shinnick vs Lisa Lamb / Lori Murphy6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShelley Boggess / Susanne Navarro vs Cynthia Daly / Debra Logue2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAggie Rupert / Lori Caple vs Lorrie Lavery / Kathy Healy7-6, 6-2
2023-01-31vs World Tennis Club - JocWon 21
W#1 DoublesMinde Shinnick / Lori Coates vs Vesna Petrovic / Gwendolyn Messonnier6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristen Catino / Shelley Boggess vs Sindi Sanzica / Tracy Lockton6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTina Albright / Gina Petherick vs Maureen Wells / Diane Cahill1-6, 4-6
2023-01-24vs Quail Creek - K. HoleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristen Catino / Shelley Boggess vs Amanda Mallette / Eileen Valerio4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLori Caple / Aggie Rupert vs Karen Hole / Barbara Sexson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCheryl Toth / Tina Albright vs Karen Tumulty / Christine Ragain4-6, 5-7
2023-01-17vs Naples Reserve - HugginsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori Coates / Minde Shinnick vs Susan Burgess / Ramsay Erickson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Shelley Boggess vs Jennifer Ball / Donna Digeronimo2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathleen Farmer / Gina Petherick vs Lori Irvin Hawes / Jan Kolesar2-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesKristen Catino / Kathleen Farmer vs Dayna Webre / Mary Miranda-Del Rossi1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLori Coates / Minde Shinnick vs Nancy Harbert / Karyn Sardar1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLori Caple / Aggie Rupert vs Sandee Kozel / Sara Munholland6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Minde Shinnick
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.77
Aggie Rupert
published 4
3.73
Kristen Catino
published
3.70
Nancy Inglese
published
3.65
Lori Caple
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Shelley Boggess
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.36
Susanne Navarro
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Tina Albright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Tiffany Moncrieff
published
3.29
Gina Petherick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kathleen Farmer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Coates
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Minde Shinnick + Lori Coates312552% games+0.2% vs expected
Kathleen Farmer + Susanne Navarro4841% games−5.6% vs expected
Lori Coates + Susanne Navarro13851% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Boggess + Susanne Navarro7548% gamesnot enough data
Susanne Navarro + Lori Caple5350% gamesnot enough data
Minde Shinnick + Shelley Boggess1638% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Farmer + Lori Coates4256% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Boggess + Kristen Catino134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Minde Shinnick
119W–115L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Aggie Rupert
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Kristen Catino
23W–21L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Nancy Inglese
73W–56L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Lori Caple
130W–93L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.65
Shelley Boggess
191W–176L career · 7 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Susanne Navarro
229W–208L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
Tina Albright
17W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.35
Tiffany Moncrieff
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Gina Petherick
61W–85L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Kathleen Farmer
75W–85L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Coates
202W–160L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.