Teams

Pelican Marsh - Barger

2023 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-01vs Olde Cypress - NavarroLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarie Shoaf / Kristine Laterra vs Kristen Catino / Shelley Boggess4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEmily Eldredge vs Nancy Inglese6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShelly-Jo Shuman / Anne Mortillaro vs Lori Coates / Kathleen Farmer1-6, 2-6
2023-02-21vs Naples Reserve - HugginsWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Krueger / Marie Shoaf vs Lynne Huggins / Tricia McBride7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStacey Mondragon / Teresa Madonia vs Samantha Almy / Ramsay Erickson3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSunny Barger / Brenda Rhoda vs Patrice Clapacs / Lori Irvin Hawes6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDiana Pleeter / Teresa Madonia vs Gladyvette Benarroch / Cara Eichenlaub6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Keillor / Fiona Prentice vs Nicki Sebold / Amy Gardner7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-02-07vs Quail Creek - K. HoleLost 01
L#3 DoublesSunny Barger / Brenda Rhoda vs Christine Ragain / Barbara Sexson5-7, 4-6
2023-01-31vs World Tennis Club - LaveryLost 13
L#1 DoublesDiana Pleeter / Karen Steuber vs Cynthia Daly / Debra Logue4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesEmily Eldredge vs Carol Polipnick1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarie Shoaf / Kristine Laterra vs Lorrie Lavery / Kimberly DiStefano6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrenda Rhoda / Shelly-Jo Shuman vs Lori Murphy / Lisa Lamb0-6, 0-6
2023-01-24vs Marco YMCA - HeiseSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCarla Klumpp / Anne Mortillaro vs Stephanie Opel / Mary Fischer0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Keillor / Stacey Mondragon vs Jacqueline Heise / Missy Kuklenski6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-01-18vs World Tennis Club - JocWon 20
W#2 DoublesDiana Pleeter / Lauren Keillor vs Michele Nelson-Baker / Catherine Barsky6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSunny Barger / Marie Shoaf vs Gwendolyn Messonnier / Helena Carolin7-6, 6-3
2023-01-10vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiana Pleeter / Karen Steuber vs Gretchen Landolt / Jae Marie Fry6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEmily Eldredge vs Marian Jacobson6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTasha Christiansen / Anne Mortillaro vs Lisa Gosney / Rachael Klaas6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Emily Eldredge
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.92
Laurie Puddester
published
3.85
Fiona Prentice
published 4
3.77
Stacey Mondragon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Diana Pleeter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Nancy Krueger
published
3.65
Marie Shoaf
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Carla Klumpp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Sunny Barger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Melody Miller
published
3.48
Brenda Rhoda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Anne Mortillaro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Lauren Keillor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Shelly-Jo Shuman
published
3.21
Nora Slusar
published
Kimberly Taylor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Rhoda + Sunny Barger495049% games+3.6% vs expected
Sunny Barger + Marie Shoaf111349% games+0.4% vs expected
Diana Pleeter + Marie Shoaf221453% games−0.2% vs expected
Diana Pleeter + Lauren Keillor191450% games−3.7% vs expected
Carla Klumpp + Sunny Barger131547% games−3.8% vs expected
Brenda Rhoda + Lauren Keillor101149% games−4.8% vs expected
Sunny Barger + Diana Pleeter10261% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Keillor + Marie Shoaf5549% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Eldredge
116W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
Laurie Puddester
21W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Fiona Prentice
33W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Stacey Mondragon
95W–102L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Diana Pleeter
139W–84L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Nancy Krueger
17W–16L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Marie Shoaf
160W–135L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Carla Klumpp
99W–93L career · 1 line in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Sunny Barger
206W–211L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
Melody Miller
31W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Brenda Rhoda
141W–148L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.48
4
Anne Mortillaro
36W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Lauren Keillor
161W–184L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Shelly-Jo Shuman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Nora Slusar
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Kimberly Taylor
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.