Teams

Pelican Bay Park - Delk

2023 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-07vs World Tennis Club - LaveryLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Gosney / Catherine Rigamer vs Lorrie Lavery / Debra Logue4-6, 2-6
2023-02-28vs Quail Creek - K. HoleWon 20
W#1 DoublesCatherine Rigamer / Kimberly Davey vs Karen Hole / Jennifer Sherman6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobin Garlich / Lisa Vivori vs Karen Tumulty / Benita Brown6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2023-02-21vs Olde Cypress - NavarroLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Davey / Lisa Gosney vs Nancy Inglese / Kristen Catino5-7, 3-6
2023-02-17vs Naples Reserve - HugginsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Davey / Gretchen Landolt vs Gina Garfunkel / Ann Heinauer6-7, 3-6
2023-01-24vs World Tennis Club - JocLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Davey / Lisa Gosney vs Maureen Wells / Diane Cahill2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Garlich / Susan Crum vs Michele Tesei / Betsy Moreno Berger4-6, 4-6
2023-01-10vs Pelican Marsh - BargerLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Crum / Susan Ash vs Kimberly Taylor / Fiona Prentice3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Catherine Rigamer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Kimberly Davey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Lisa Vivori
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Jae Marie Fry
published
3.54
Robin Garlich
published
3.52
Rachael Klaas
published
3.48
Hillary Cooper
published
3.39
Gretchen Landolt
published
3.31
Mia Delk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
Marketa Dieckmann
published
Susan Ash
published
Susan Crum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Rigamer + Kimberly Davey112245% games+1.3% vs expected
Rachael Klaas + Jae Marie Fry21837% games−3.5% vs expected
Kimberly Davey + Mia Delk4746% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Rigamer
75W–68L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Kimberly Davey
129W–159L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Lisa Vivori
82W–122L career · 1 line in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Jae Marie Fry
7W–25L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Robin Garlich
67W–77L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.54
Rachael Klaas
4W–23L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Hillary Cooper
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
Gretchen Landolt
11W–24L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Mia Delk
270W–303L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
Marie France McCloskey
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marketa Dieckmann
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Ash
40W–57L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Crum
53W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.