Teams

Dobbins/Borthwick Get a Grip

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-21vs ICC 18+ 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRuth Eliason / Melodie Marx vs Jessica Moody / Betsy Tello7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-07-14vs Overdahl/Dymit Sum25Won 32
W#1 DoublesStacey Douville / Emily Starita vs Annie Staloch / Kathy Cima6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKristin Lambrecht vs Cate Dymit6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoanie Gold / Ellen Dobbins vs Shannon Overdahl / Molly Dymit6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDonnette Tanner vs Ashley Pitzen6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCory Borthwick / Jennifer Harris vs Shannon Ellis / Lizzy Larson2-6, 3-6
2025-07-07vs MILLER - ECCLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Warren / Emily Starita vs Shannon Anderson / Jane Hill6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesKristin Lambrecht vs Amy Gustafson1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPam Bowden / Ellen Dobbins vs Stephanie Sislo / Kirsten Rewey6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Sandberg / Shagu Heal vs Betsy Johnson / Patty Knopick3-6, 3-6
2025-06-30vs Northern/Wolson/18&Over3.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesRuth Eliason / Melodie Marx vs Smitha Abbott / Julianne Braun7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-23vs Rindt: MTC 18+ Summer LeagueWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Starita / Ruth Eliason vs Suzanne Jones Schneekloth / Jenny Starkey6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-06-03vs Ehle/Henke 18+ Summer 2025Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRuth Eliason / Donnette Tanner vs Heidi Johnson / Susan Nixon5-7, 2-6
2025-05-19vs Overdahl/Dymit Sum25Won 30
W#1 DoublesStacey Douville / Melodie Marx vs Lizzy Larson / Aimee Speier6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAmy Tjornhom vs Jada Olson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoanie Gold / Pam Bowden vs Molly Dymit / Ashley Pitzen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-12vs Northern/Wolson/18&Over3.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesRuth Eliason / Melodie Marx vs Emma Hartmann / Stephanie Stoup7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-05vs Ehle/Henke 18+ Summer 2025Won 10
W#1 DoublesRuth Eliason / Emily Starita vs Jennifer Wenck / Heidi Johnson6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Pam Bowden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Mary Kennedy
published
3.45
Emily Starita
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Stacey Douville
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Carrie Stolar
published 3.5
3.41
Ellen Dobbins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Donnette Tanner
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Kristin Lambrecht
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.35
Ruth Eliason
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Jennifer Warren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Melodie Marx
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Amy Tjornhom
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Maggie Hillmer
published
3.09
Cory Borthwick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Joanie Gold
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Michelle Sandberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Shagu Heal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Dobbins + Carrie Stolar10259% games+8.4% vs expected
Jennifer Warren + Emily Starita141556% games+1.4% vs expected
Maggie Hillmer + Melodie Marx191352% games−2.9% vs expected
Shagu Heal + Michelle Sandberg2641% games−7.9% vs expected
Joanie Gold + Ellen Dobbins4146% gamesnot enough data
Stacey Douville + Emily Starita314 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Dobbins + Ruth Eliason314 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Eliason + Pam Bowden224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam Bowden
31W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Mary Kennedy
8W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Emily Starita
38W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Stacey Douville
32W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Carrie Stolar
32W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Ellen Dobbins
50W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Donnette Tanner
14W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Kristin Lambrecht
43W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Ruth Eliason
263W–178L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Jennifer Warren
26W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Melodie Marx
25W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Amy Tjornhom
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Maggie Hillmer
31W–24L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Cory Borthwick
22W–23L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Joanie Gold
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.09
Michelle Sandberg
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Shagu Heal
9W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.