Teams

Kraska/Bettinger 3.5 18 Mon

2023 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-08vs Harding 3.5 18 MonWon 10
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Deb Budler6-1, 6-0
2023-04-24vs Yates 3.5 18s MonWon 10
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Monica Billingsley6-3, 6-1
2023-04-17vs Lowman 3.5 18 Mon PiedmontWon 10
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Courtney Penley7-6, 6-4
2023-04-03vs Isner/Pate 3.5 18s MonLost 01
L#2 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Jordan Hedrick3-6, 4-6
2023-03-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Lindsey Murphy3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-13Won 10
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Holly Jones6-1, 6-1
2023-03-06vs Dulin 3.5 18 MonWon 10
W#1 SinglesLayne Saunders vs Melissa Gujrati6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Layne Saunders
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
3.72
Stephanie Bettinger
published
3.71
Lindsay Olin
published
3.69
Julie Dover
published
3.56
Casey Emmendorfer
published 3.5
3.53
Natalie Harris
published
3.49
Andrea Sweat
published 3.5
3.47
Elisabeth Kraska
published
3.44
Jacqueline Herron
published
3.39
April Moss
published 3.5
3.39
Betsy Hooper
published 3.5
3.17
Aprille Black
published 3.5
3.07
Sonia Haslam
published
2.83
Julie Streng
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisabeth Kraska + Stephanie Bettinger4356% games+1.5% vs expected
Elisabeth Kraska + Casey Emmendorfer404 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Sweat + Natalie Harris213 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Harris + Betsy Hooper033 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Hooper + Casey Emmendorfer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Layne Saunders
151W–74L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.87
Stephanie Bettinger
25W–18L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Lindsay Olin
19W–14L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Julie Dover
40W–22L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Casey Emmendorfer
45W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.56
Natalie Harris
48W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Andrea Sweat
26W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.49
Elisabeth Kraska
44W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
Jacqueline Herron
36W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
April Moss
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.39
3.5
Betsy Hooper
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Aprille Black
11W–19L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Sonia Haslam
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.07
Julie Streng
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.