Teams

Yates 3.5 18s Mon

2023 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Rachel Kohler
published
3.37
Deirdre Hjelt
published 3.5
3.35
Tiana Pitts
published
3.29
Jen Berlin
published
3.24
Allison Walsh
published 3.5
3.23
Britt Molitoris
published 3.5
3.23
Amy Bunch
published 3.5
3.14
Allison Pool
published 3.5
3.09
Monica Billingsley
published
3.04
Jennifer Yates
published
2.93
Cassidy MacKay
published 3
2.79
Leigh Trigilio
published
Kim Kyle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiana Pitts + Amy Bunch5547% games+5.5% vs expected
Allison Pool + Jen Berlin2440% games−2.1% vs expected
Jennifer Yates + Allison Walsh1441% gamesnot enough data
Tiana Pitts + Allison Walsh314 matchesnot enough data
Deirdre Hjelt + Jen Berlin224 matchesnot enough data
Monica Billingsley + Cassidy MacKay213 matchesnot enough data
Deirdre Hjelt + Allison Pool123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Kohler
34W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
3.5
Deirdre Hjelt
54W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
Tiana Pitts
38W–24L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
Jen Berlin
22W–25L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Allison Walsh
20W–27L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Britt Molitoris
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Amy Bunch
31W–35L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Allison Pool
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Monica Billingsley
20W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.09
Jennifer Yates
8W–28L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Cassidy MacKay
26W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
Leigh Trigilio
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
2.79
Kim Kyle
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.