Teams

LeDoux/40s/7.5/PAC

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings4 teams · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pausina/40s/7.5/SC812439153
2LeDoux/40s/7.5/PAC54121533237
3Daskalova/40s/7.5/BC45101740293
4Chatham/40s/7.5/FAC Day1881943294

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Amy Burdette
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.68
Amy Bergeron
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 4
3.64
Catherine Martinez
usually #1 Singles 49%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.55
April Luscy
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4
Lynette Blossman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Marta Brasseaux
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Missy Chatelain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Pamela Owen
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
Patricia Schultz
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ronda Walters
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Shannon Enk
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Shannon LeDoux
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronda Walters + Shannon Enk9754% gamesnot enough data
Missy Chatelain + Shannon LeDoux5350% gamesnot enough data
April Luscy + Patricia Schultz5169% gamesnot enough data
April Luscy + Marta Brasseaux3349% gamesnot enough data
Shannon Enk + Marta Brasseaux134 matchesnot enough data
Amy Burdette + Lynette Blossman123 matchesnot enough data
April Luscy + Pamela Owen033 matchesnot enough data
Lynette Blossman + Patricia Schultz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Burdette
30W–14L career · 16 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Amy Bergeron
23W–16L career · 24 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Catherine Martinez
30W–14L career · 33 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
April Luscy
22W–20L career · 26 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Lynette Blossman
13W–14L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marta Brasseaux
19W–16L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Missy Chatelain
10W–6L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Owen
17W–14L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Schultz
25W–11L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronda Walters
32W–18L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Enk
52W–32L career · 47 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon LeDoux
19W–14L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.