Teams

Chatham/40s/7.5/FAC Day

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings4 teams · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pausina/40s/7.5/SC812439153
2LeDoux/40s/7.5/PAC54121533237
3Daskalova/40s/7.5/BC45101740293
4Chatham/40s/7.5/FAC Day1881943294

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Carolyn Kalman
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 4
3.46
Debra Ethridge
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 4
Bonnie Boettner
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.07
Bridget Boudreaux
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Karen Magee
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Linda Goudeau
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Keiffer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Lynn Durant
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Melanie Cook
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Melissa Verges
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Michaela Franklin
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Shelley Sisson
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Stephanie Tickner
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Suzanne Allison
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Wendy Morise
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Goudeau + Suzanne Allison6359% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Kalman + Debra Ethridge3351% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Kalman + Linda Goudeau314 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Verges + Wendy Morise134 matchesnot enough data
Bonnie Boettner + Suzanne Allison314 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Durant + Karen Magee044 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Cook + Suzanne Allison033 matchesnot enough data
Michaela Franklin + Melissa Verges033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Kalman
23W–23L career · 27 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Debra Ethridge
12W–15L career · 14 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Bonnie Boettner
13W–8L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Bridget Boudreaux
5W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.07
Karen Magee
2W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Goudeau
28W–24L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Keiffer
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Durant
8W–13L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Cook
6W–17L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Verges
18W–17L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michaela Franklin
20W–22L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelley Sisson
11W–11L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Tickner
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Allison
30W–14L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Morise
14W–13L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.