Teams

Daskalova/40s/7.5/BC

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-13Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCasey Upton / Katie Kabrich vs Rhonda Eckholdt / Vonda Downing3-6, 0-6
2025-09-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBridgette Taylor / Casey Upton vs Courtney Bourgeois / Dawn Ledet4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Cov Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pausina/40s/7.5/SC812439153
2LeDoux/40s/7.5/PAC54121533237
3Daskalova/40s/7.5/BC45101740293
4Chatham/40s/7.5/FAC Day1881943294

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Bridgette Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 4
3.72
Heather Vinet Jones
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 4
3.46
Amy Malloy
usually #1 Doubles 34%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published 3.5
3.33
Celeste Collins
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published 3.5
3.29
Courtney Dodson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published 3.5
3.20
Bridget Ory
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.19
Erinn Legendre
usually #1 Singles 32%, also #2 Singles 23% · published 3.5
3.01
Casey Upton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Katherine Hodgins
usually #3 Doubles 32%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published
Katie Kabrich
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published
Lindsay Johnson
published
Lisa Hamaker
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Toce
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Michelle Pecoraro
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Violeta Daskalova
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bridgette Taylor + Celeste Collins2447% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Hamaker + Bridgette Taylor2353% gamesnot enough data
Violeta Daskalova + Heather Vinet Jones3248% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Pecoraro + Celeste Collins2343% gamesnot enough data
Amy Malloy + Celeste Collins224 matchesnot enough data
Violeta Daskalova + Bridgette Taylor134 matchesnot enough data
Violeta Daskalova + Celeste Collins314 matchesnot enough data
Violeta Daskalova + Mary Toce224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bridgette Taylor
14W–21L career · 25 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Heather Vinet Jones
7W–8L career · 11 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Amy Malloy
38W–18L career · 37 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Celeste Collins
33W–32L career · 43 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Courtney Dodson
21W–15L career · 25 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Bridget Ory
7W–11L career · 13 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Erinn Legendre
22W–20L career · 20 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Casey Upton
1W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Katherine Hodgins
27W–19L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Kabrich
10W–15L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsay Johnson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Hamaker
6W–15L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Toce
41W–26L career · 45 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Pecoraro
11W–15L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data
Violeta Daskalova
37W–28L career · 48 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.