Teams

Carmelli/40/4.0/M/Stonecreek

2025 Man · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGregory Eckholdt / Dean JR Melancon vs Robert Economides / Eddie Burdette1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesRodd Russell / Dean JR Melancon vs Edward Dauterive / Joey Dunbar5-7, 1-6
2025-02-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesUncas Favret / Frank Carmeli vs Jay Butcher / Mitch Tucker5-2
L#1 DoublesUncas Favret / Andrew Biehler vs Eddie Burdette / Joey Dunbar2-6, 2-6
2025-01-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Ledet / Uncas Favret vs Jay Butcher / Shane McCarthy4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Hal Neitzschman
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.64
Andrew Biehler
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Dean JR Melancon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Frank Carmeli
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gregory Eckholdt
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Matt Slimming
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Michael Fitzmorris
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Michael Ledet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Patrick Fraher
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Rodd Russell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sidney Montecino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Uncas Favret
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hal Neitzschman
9W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Andrew Biehler
5W–8L career · type M · 8 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Dean JR Melancon
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Frank Carmeli
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gregory Eckholdt
8W–9L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Slimming
48W–25L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Fitzmorris
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Ledet
2W–6L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patrick Fraher
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rodd Russell
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sidney Montecino
11W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Uncas Favret
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.