Teams

SPANISH OAKS

2022 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 6.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-03vs DTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnnabel Elliott / June Sartini vs Maria Lowry / Jennifer Olson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShay Momiroff / Vicki Schwartz vs Christy Rowley / Karen Wooldridge4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEllen Arcella / Doris Gagne vs Karen Donaldson / Moon-Hui Choi6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-20vs SPANISH TRAIL #1Won 30
W#1 DoublesAnnabel Elliott / Deborah Graham vs Annette Bradley / Elizabeth Templeton6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCarla Kuhl / Shay Momiroff vs Arline Marquez / Diane Sorrentino6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAldema Ridge / Brenda Talley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-13vs SPANISH TRAIL #2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAnnabel Elliott / Shay Momiroff vs Patricia Braganza / Laurie Musselman7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEllen Arcella / Deborah Graham vs Erlinda Joven / Deborah O'Connor7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarla Kuhl / Brenda Talley vs Lucy Dadourian / Jane Hodges3-6, 5-7
2022-05-06vs NV/BOONE/ADULT 55 & OVER W6.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAnnabel Elliott / Shay Momiroff vs Valerie Valow-Orris / Ada Vera6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEllen Arcella / Brenda Talley vs Monica Baldwin / Bambi Montag3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDeborah Graham / Carla Kuhl vs Clairen Peeters / Stacy Burr3-6, 1-6
2022-04-27vs DTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesShay Momiroff / Brenda Talley vs Carroll Welch / Karen Donaldson4-6, 1-1
L#2 DoublesEllen Arcella / Aldema Ridge vs Moon-Hui Choi / Sharyn Gagne1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJune Sartini / Vicki Schwartz vs Athene Garfield / Rose Tucker3-6, 3-3
2022-04-08vs SPANISH TRAIL #1Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAnnabel Elliott / June Sartini vs Kathleen Richardson / Shelly Figueredo6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDoris Gagne / Shay Momiroff vs Trish Bradley-Garvin / Gretchen Hau4-6, 1-1
L#3 DoublesCarla Kuhl / Aldema Ridge vs Arline Marquez / Diane Sorrentino4-6, 4-6
2022-04-01vs SPANISH TRAIL #2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAnnabel Elliott / Shay Momiroff vs Patricia Braganza / Joan Chevalier6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarla Kuhl / Aldema Ridge vs Jane Hodges / Dawn Garner3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesVicki Schwartz / Deborah Graham vs Erlinda Joven / Deborah O'Connor2-6, 6-7
2022-03-25vs NV/BOONE/ADULT 55 & OVER W6.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnabel Elliott / June Sartini vs Denise Boone / Ada Vera5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDeborah Graham / Brenda Talley vs Mary McCrary / Natalie Gamberg4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEllen Arcella / Aldema Ridge vs Kristy Andrade / Kathy Robinson3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 WOMEN- 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Annabel Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 79%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 3
Aldema Ridge
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Brenda Talley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
June Sartini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Carla Kuhl
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.61
Deborah Graham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Doris Gagne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Ellen Arcella
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Shay Momiroff
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Graham + Carla Kuhl193544% games−2.4% vs expected
Annabel Elliott + Ellen Arcella21136% games−2.7% vs expected
Annabel Elliott + Carla Kuhl11036% games−4.3% vs expected
Carla Kuhl + Brenda Talley31638% games−5.6% vs expected
Annabel Elliott + Brenda Talley4937% games−11.7% vs expected
June Sartini + Annabel Elliott9853% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Arcella + Aldema Ridge21432% gamesnot enough data
Ellen Arcella + Shay Momiroff6943% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Annabel Elliott
119W–186L career · 14 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Aldema Ridge
29W–74L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Brenda Talley
31W–134L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
June Sartini
27W–47L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Carla Kuhl
71W–204L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Deborah Graham
56W–153L career · 8 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.61
2.5
Doris Gagne
18W–77L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Ellen Arcella
17W–88L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Shay Momiroff
23W–27L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.