Teams

4SCWB-CHEN 65WOMEN SEM F6

2024 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 65 COMBO SEM

17 players · average NTRP 3.17 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-12-15vs 3BEV-BRUECKMAN 65WOMEN SEM F6Won 21
L#1 DoublesBirgit Sorgenfrei / Arwa Ansara vs Marisa Marco / Honor Gedda4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanene Kummer / Andrea McHale vs Andrea Burg / Calynn Berry6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVania White / Ana White vs Abbey Werder / Sara Armour6-0, 6-4
2024-11-23vs 2FAC-MEYERS 65WOMEN SEM F6Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMinlu Chen / Carla Kumrow vs Meredith Tipton / Krista Larkin1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrittany Smithkort / Andrea McHale vs Betty Croft / Courtney Glaser3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJulie Kraemer / Melissa Travers vs Ranya Agha / Carlee Meyers2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-11-16vs 1WESS-STRASSER 65WOMEN SEM F6Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMinlu Chen / Andrea McHale vs Leslie Patron / Hiroko Torigoe2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJen Zebari / Jane Hale vs Margaret Mowbray / Nancy Gray2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrittany Smithkort / Katherine Ross vs Laurel Kalkanis / Dina Hurnevich4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-09vs 3BEV-BRUECKMAN 65WOMEN SEM F6Won 30
W#1 DoublesBrittany Smithkort / Samantha Prince vs Kate Brueckman / Elizabeth Tschannen6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMinlu Chen / Carla Kumrow vs Honor Gedda / Calynn Berry6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMelissa Travers / Julie Kraemer vs Abbey Werder / Sara Armour6-0, 6-4
2024-11-02vs 2FAC-MEYERS 65WOMEN SEM F6Won 21
W#1 DoublesVania White / Arwa Ansara vs Annette Kizy / Ranya Agha5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBirgit Sorgenfrei / Carla Kumrow vs Meredith Tipton / Sara Jean Baker3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJen Zebari / Jane Hale vs Rina Salazar / Betty Croft6-3, 6-3
2024-10-23vs 1WESS-STRASSER 65WOMEN SEM F6Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMinlu Chen / Katherine Ross vs Lilian Strasser / Terri Griffin1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesArwa Ansara / Jennifer Kvalevog vs Margaret Mowbray / Leslie Patron3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJen Zebari / Jane Hale vs Laurel Kalkanis / Dina Hurnevich2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-18vs 3BEV-BRUECKMAN 65WOMEN SEM F6Won 20
W#1 DoublesArwa Ansara / Brittany Smithkort vs Honor Gedda / Kate Brueckman6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJanene Kummer / Samantha Prince vs Calynn Berry / Sara Armour6-2, 6-1
2024-10-04vs 2FAC-MEYERS 65WOMEN SEM F6Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrittany Smithkort / Julie Kraemer vs Mona Elmaamoun / Robyn Presser6-4, 6-3
2024-09-29vs 1WESS-STRASSER 65WOMEN SEM F6Won 20
W#2 DoublesJanene Kummer / Carla Kumrow vs Anne Schlecht / Nancy Gray6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMinlu Chen / Andrea McHale vs Jill Davis / Lina E Bata6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · WOMEN 65 COMBO SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11LIB-MARLEY 65WOMEN SEM F18123412169
23HV-KING 65WOMEN SEM F28122514178
33EAST-SZABO 65WOMEN SEM F38121618195
42TROY-LI 65WOMEN SEM F5712136124
54PEACH-PARROTT 65WOMEN SEM F47117720211
66SCWB-BARTHOLOMEW 65WOMEN SEM F57117720161
71TROY-VONDELL 65WOMEN SEM F46216822196
81WESS-STRASSER 65WOMEN SEM F66319820190
94HV-CUTLER 65WOMEN SEM F163161126223
101TROY-SEGERLIND 65WOMEN SEM F363161128238
114SCWB-CHEN 65WOMEN SEM F663151228218
122FAC-MEYERS 65WOMEN SEM F654171025224
132LIB-DOBSON 65WOMEN SEM F254161129238
141TRAV-SKOCHELAK 65WOMEN SEM F254141331240
152BRC-NOVOTNY 65WOMEN SEM F435121228204
165FAC-SMITH 65WOMEN SEM F435101431218
171WESS-BROWN 65WOMEN SEM F535101432223
182VTC-JOHNSTON 65WOMEN SEM F13691838270
192LIFE-MARVEL-NELSON 65WOMEN SEM F33681940263
203BEV-MOORE 65WOMEN SEM F52671736258
213LIFE-ANDERSON 65WOMEN SEM F41751939257
224FAC-JOHNSON 65WOMEN SEM F51751941258
234PEACH-HARTEL 65WOMEN SEM F31891840279
243HV-BELCHER 65WOMEN SEM F11862145293
253BEV-BRUECKMAN 65WOMEN SEM F61832449301
264DEAR-LOWLER 65 WOMEN SEM F20922551309

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Janene Kummer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Birgit Sorgenfrei
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Vania White
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.08
Jane Hale
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Jen Zebari
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Brittany Smithkort
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Andrea McHale
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
Minlu Chen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.84
Arwa Ansara
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Melissa Travers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Julie Kraemer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Conway
published 3
Carla Kumrow
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Ana White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jennifer Kvalevog
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Ross
published
Maria Gauchey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jen Zebari + Minlu Chen1547% games+5.8% vs expected
Andrea McHale + Carla Kumrow3646% games+0.9% vs expected
Vania White + Ana White2450% games−2.2% vs expected
Maria Gauchey + Minlu Chen1539% games−2.8% vs expected
Jen Zebari + Melissa Travers5357% gamesnot enough data
Minlu Chen + Andrea McHale2345% gamesnot enough data
Minlu Chen + Carla Kumrow314 matchesnot enough data
Arwa Ansara + Carla Kumrow224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janene Kummer
62W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Birgit Sorgenfrei
143W–85L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.38
Vania White
93W–65L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Jane Hale
32W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
3.5
Jen Zebari
81W–67L career · 3 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Brittany Smithkort
39W–39L career · 5 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Andrea McHale
69W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3.5
Minlu Chen
110W–160L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Arwa Ansara
76W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Melissa Travers
68W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
2.81
Julie Kraemer
41W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Amy Conway
37W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Carla Kumrow
23W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Ana White
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Kvalevog
15W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Katherine Ross
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Gauchey
53W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.