Teams

1WESS-BROWN 65WOMEN SEM F5

2024 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 65 COMBO SEM

19 players · average NTRP 3.28 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-15vs 4FAC-JOHNSON 65WOMEN SEM F5Won 10
W#2 DoublesShannon Matuska / Denise Fernandez vs Lindsey Weitzman. / Erin Koppelman6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2024-12-14vs 2TROY-LI 65WOMEN SEM F5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSamantha Ruma / Lora Leslie vs Elizabeth Smagala / Stephanie Rossow2-6, 3-6
2024-12-07vs 3BEV-MOORE 65WOMEN SEM F5Won 10
W#2 DoublesNikki Little / Carla Bibart vs Brannon Alexander / Cheryl Somers6-1, 6-4
2024-11-23vs 4FAC-JOHNSON 65WOMEN SEM F5Won 30
W#1 DoublesNikki Little / Carla Bibart vs Linda Morisseau / Kimberly Danowski6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNora Beevers / Shannon Matuska vs Barbara Goldberg / Paula Finkel6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCheryl Couretas / ELISA CARRARO vs Karen Pigford / Monica Moray6-2, 6-3
2024-11-08vs 6SCWB-BARTHOLOMEW 65WOMEN SEM F5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Lanesky / Lora Leslie vs Aiko Lapinski / Konomi Aino7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLynn Bechtel / Carla Bibart vs Kana Chan / Allison Huber2-6, 3-6
2024-11-01Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNikki Little / Carla Bibart vs Daniela Stucchi / Kristen Yablonski3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Lanesky / Lora Leslie vs Agnieszka Palarz / Alice Currier1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Matuska / Lina Carouba vs Tara Sengupta / Claudia Langsdorf2-6, 0-6
2024-10-26vs 3BEV-MOORE 65WOMEN SEM F5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCheryl Couretas / Lily Bakleh vs Amanda Podgorny / Laura Besecke3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-09-28vs 6SCWB-BARTHOLOMEW 65WOMEN SEM F5Split 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle Lanesky / Lora Leslie vs Miki Yaguchi / Sherry Du7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNikki Little / Denise Fernandez vs Carrie Ramon / Akina Hirose4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · WOMEN 65 COMBO SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11LIB-MARLEY 65WOMEN SEM F18123412169
23HV-KING 65WOMEN SEM F28122514178
33EAST-SZABO 65WOMEN SEM F38121618195
42TROY-LI 65WOMEN SEM F5712136124
54PEACH-PARROTT 65WOMEN SEM F47117720211
66SCWB-BARTHOLOMEW 65WOMEN SEM F57117720161
71TROY-VONDELL 65WOMEN SEM F46216822196
81WESS-STRASSER 65WOMEN SEM F66319820190
94HV-CUTLER 65WOMEN SEM F163161126223
101TROY-SEGERLIND 65WOMEN SEM F363161128238
114SCWB-CHEN 65WOMEN SEM F663151228218
122FAC-MEYERS 65WOMEN SEM F654171025224
132LIB-DOBSON 65WOMEN SEM F254161129238
141TRAV-SKOCHELAK 65WOMEN SEM F254141331240
152BRC-NOVOTNY 65WOMEN SEM F435121228204
165FAC-SMITH 65WOMEN SEM F435101431218
171WESS-BROWN 65WOMEN SEM F535101432223
182VTC-JOHNSTON 65WOMEN SEM F13691838270
192LIFE-MARVEL-NELSON 65WOMEN SEM F33681940263
203BEV-MOORE 65WOMEN SEM F52671736258
213LIFE-ANDERSON 65WOMEN SEM F41751939257
224FAC-JOHNSON 65WOMEN SEM F51751941258
234PEACH-HARTEL 65WOMEN SEM F31891840279
243HV-BELCHER 65WOMEN SEM F11862145293
253BEV-BRUECKMAN 65WOMEN SEM F61832449301
264DEAR-LOWLER 65 WOMEN SEM F20922551309

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Michelle Lanesky
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Carla Bibart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Lora Leslie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Lynn Bechtel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Shannon Matuska
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Bonnie Treece
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Michelle Wooddell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Nora Beevers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Nikki Little
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Samantha Ruma
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Heidi Malin
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.90
Annie Bakken
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Denise Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Nina Brown
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.86
Cheryl Couretas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.82
ELISA CARRARO
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Christine Joyce
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.70
Lily Bakleh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Lina Carouba
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Fernandez + Bonnie Treece8173% games+15.9% vs expected
Nina Brown + Bonnie Treece14163% games+9.2% vs expected
Nina Brown + Lora Leslie2351% games+7.2% vs expected
Heidi Malin + Bonnie Treece5453% games+6.3% vs expected
Heidi Malin + Nina Brown9752% games+3.0% vs expected
Nikki Little + Carla Bibart11951% games+2.6% vs expected
Annie Bakken + Nina Brown6257% games+1.2% vs expected
Lina Carouba + Lily Bakleh382456% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michelle Lanesky
91W–91L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Carla Bibart
45W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Lora Leslie
52W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Lynn Bechtel
87W–84L career · 1 line in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Shannon Matuska
75W–88L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Bonnie Treece
106W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Michelle Wooddell
143W–150L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Nora Beevers
68W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
Nikki Little
31W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Samantha Ruma
74W–96L career · 6 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Heidi Malin
133W–136L career · 7 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Annie Bakken
46W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Denise Fernandez
64W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.88
3
Nina Brown
146W–135L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Cheryl Couretas
24W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
ELISA CARRARO
106W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Christine Joyce
24W–22L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Lily Bakleh
49W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Lina Carouba
61W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.