Teams

1LIB-MARLEY 65WOMEN SEM F1

2024 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 65 COMBO SEM

21 players · average NTRP 3.43 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesKristi Bowlby / Sun Min Jung vs Jennifer Yuan / Julie Roth7-5, 6-3
2024-11-16vs 4HV-CUTLER 65WOMEN SEM F1Split 11
W#1 DoublesKylee Bezeau / Aubrey Pavlik vs Nathalie Vandecan / Ellen Rambo6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnne Denoyer / Vivian Marley vs Petra Schroeder / Kristen Verhey1-6, 3-6
2024-11-10vs 2VTC-JOHNSTON 65WOMEN SEM F1Won 10
W#2 DoublesKaci Kehrt / Sun Min Jung vs Lilia Cortina / Jen Guerra Short6-2, 7-5
2024-11-02vs 3HV-BELCHER 65WOMEN SEM F1Won 20
W#1 DoublesAubrey Pavlik / Ashley Mooney vs Kelly Belcher / Bonnie Demetral6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Dawson / Lichee St. Pierre vs Ruth Dunkle / Jane Tucker6-1, 6-2
2024-10-26vs 4HV-CUTLER 65WOMEN SEM F1Won 20
W#2 DoublesEira Duran / Anne Denoyer vs Nathalie Vandecan / MAHI VENKAT6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLichee St. Pierre / Qi Gao vs Annette Kretzler / Deb Ladenheim4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-29vs 4HV-CUTLER 65WOMEN SEM F1Won 30
W#1 DoublesJeanne Cooper / Aubrey Pavlik vs Nathalie Vandecan / MAHI VENKAT6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAshley Mooney / Nancy Cleland vs Petra Schroeder / Marianne Clauw6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLichee St. Pierre / Qi Gao vs Cathy Gendron Johns / Susan Cutler4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings26 teams · WOMEN 65 COMBO SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11LIB-MARLEY 65WOMEN SEM F18123412169
23HV-KING 65WOMEN SEM F28122514178
33EAST-SZABO 65WOMEN SEM F38121618195
42TROY-LI 65WOMEN SEM F5712136124
54PEACH-PARROTT 65WOMEN SEM F47117720211
66SCWB-BARTHOLOMEW 65WOMEN SEM F57117720161
71TROY-VONDELL 65WOMEN SEM F46216822196
81WESS-STRASSER 65WOMEN SEM F66319820190
94HV-CUTLER 65WOMEN SEM F163161126223
101TROY-SEGERLIND 65WOMEN SEM F363161128238
114SCWB-CHEN 65WOMEN SEM F663151228218
122FAC-MEYERS 65WOMEN SEM F654171025224
132LIB-DOBSON 65WOMEN SEM F254161129238
141TRAV-SKOCHELAK 65WOMEN SEM F254141331240
152BRC-NOVOTNY 65WOMEN SEM F435121228204
165FAC-SMITH 65WOMEN SEM F435101431218
171WESS-BROWN 65WOMEN SEM F535101432223
182VTC-JOHNSTON 65WOMEN SEM F13691838270
192LIFE-MARVEL-NELSON 65WOMEN SEM F33681940263
203BEV-MOORE 65WOMEN SEM F52671736258
213LIFE-ANDERSON 65WOMEN SEM F41751939257
224FAC-JOHNSON 65WOMEN SEM F51751941258
234PEACH-HARTEL 65WOMEN SEM F31891840279
243HV-BELCHER 65WOMEN SEM F11862145293
253BEV-BRUECKMAN 65WOMEN SEM F61832449301
264DEAR-LOWLER 65 WOMEN SEM F20922551309

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Kylee Bezeau
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Heather Cooper
published 4
3.68
Ashley Mooney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Chelsea Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Jeanne Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Eira Duran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.46
Aubrey Pavlik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Emily Dawson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.36
Katherine Arst
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Colleen Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Rosa Lee
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Qi Gao
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Anne Denoyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Vivian Marley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Kaci Kehrt
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.90
Lichee St. Pierre
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Korin Kustarz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Nancy Cleland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kaylee Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kristi Bowlby
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Sun Min Jung
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Arst + Jeanne Cooper11262% games+7.6% vs expected
Kylee Bezeau + Eira Duran3352% games+1.3% vs expected
Vivian Marley + Lichee St. Pierre0632% games−14.7% vs expected
Jeanne Cooper + Qi Gao5085% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Arst + Rosa Lee404 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Arst + Nancy Cleland224 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Cooper + Ashley Mooney404 matchesnot enough data
Vivian Marley + Jeanne Cooper213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kylee Bezeau
49W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Heather Cooper
55W–61L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Ashley Mooney
128W–34L career · 6 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Chelsea Doyle
72W–14L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
Jeanne Cooper
179W–54L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
4
Eira Duran
148W–66L career · 8 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Aubrey Pavlik
46W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Emily Dawson
89W–31L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Katherine Arst
118W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Colleen Hughes
37W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
Rosa Lee
66W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Qi Gao
95W–41L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Anne Denoyer
55W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
3.5
Vivian Marley
107W–94L career · 3 lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.93
3
Kaci Kehrt
49W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Lichee St. Pierre
100W–111L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
Korin Kustarz
65W–41L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Nancy Cleland
93W–70L career · 1 line in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Kaylee Tucker
18W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristi Bowlby
30W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sun Min Jung
37W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.