Teams

Deucebags 9.5

2026 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 4.70 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-02vs Lil Rascals 9.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesDan Buckingham / Rilee Moorhead vs Ellie Gamble / Victor Do6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandy Vo / Jeff Buckingham vs Alex Wong / Lina Boylan1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTyler Neill / Oleksandra Ivanova vs Evan Walther / Delaney Canning7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-31vs Lil Rascals 9.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJack Yount / Lauren Drew vs Victor Do / Ellie Gamble2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJami Garver / Jeff Buckingham vs Stephanie Baier / Sean McDaniel2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMike Kirby / Rilee Moorhead vs Ashlin Carlisle / Casey Austgen2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-08-26vs Lil Rascals 9.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDan Buckingham / Lauren Drew vs Sean McDaniel / Stephanie Baier3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMax Yount / Sandy Vo vs Trevor Jones / Ashlin Carlisle4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Haskell / Kevin Jay vs Casey Austgen / Delaney Canning1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lil Rascals 9.51021219
2Deucebags 9.50112535

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.88
Dan Buckingham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.76
Theresa Haskell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.68
Jack Yount
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.59
Oleksandra Ivanova
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.53
Rilee Moorhead
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.52
Kimberly Mrozek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.51
Tyler Neill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.47
Lauren Drew
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.46
Kevin Jay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Jami Garver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Jeff Buckingham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Max Yount
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sandy Vo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Neill + Theresa Haskell4171% games+7.7% vs expected
Rilee Moorhead + Dan Buckingham9360% games+4.5% vs expected
Oleksandra Ivanova + Tyler Neill7553% games−5.3% vs expected
Rilee Moorhead + Jeff Buckingham282253% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Vo + Jeff Buckingham6555% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Vo + Dan Buckingham9067% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Buckingham + Theresa Haskell0832% gamesnot enough data
Jami Garver + Tyler Neill0638% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Dan Buckingham
128W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
4.88
5
Theresa Haskell
81W–62L career · type M · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
4.76
5
Jack Yount
6W–10L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
4.68
4.5
Oleksandra Ivanova
75W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%25%75%
4.59
4.5
Rilee Moorhead
74W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
4.53
4.5
Kimberly Mrozek
25W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.52
5
Tyler Neill
100W–81L career · 1 line in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.51
4.5
Lauren Drew
65W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
4.47
4.5
Kevin Jay
42W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Jami Garver
59W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.10
Jeff Buckingham
50W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Max Yount
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandy Vo
53W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.