Teams

Ellsworth/CR

2024 TUL ADULT 18 & Over League · 2.5 WOMEN

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-29vs Orange 2: Amber Hendrix/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeah Maples / Kendall Ellsworth vs Amber Hendrix / Elizabeth Skelton2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMia Perkins vs Allison Creel2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMegan McKinney / Brooke Sawyer vs Crystal Maguire / Leah Jappe4-6, 0-6
2024-05-14vs Payne/LFLost 12
W#1 DoublesLeah Maples / Courtney Duffy vs Miranda Grimes / Holly Bevill6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBrooke Sawyer vs Jo Flory5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrynne Hinkle / Tiffany Osborne vs Audrey Reeves / Mary Vrooman1-6, 3-6
2024-05-07vs Venable/TUWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeagan Schatzman / Brynne Hinkle vs Micah Tjeerdsma / Meredith Briley6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJenifer Gravley / Brooke Sawyer vs Anna Lukes / Alicia Murdock6-3, 6-2
2024-05-02vs Coker/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesCourtney Duffy / Kendall Ellsworth vs Jen Taylor / Jamie Huth3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMegan McKinney vs Leslie Southerland7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMia Perkins / Liberty Gorospe vs Chere Fergerson / Christy Reece7-5, 6-3
2024-04-23vs Knight/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesCourtney Duffy / Kendall Ellsworth vs Lisa Kramer / Susamma Rajan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMia Perkins vs Kim Lauer3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMegan McKinney / Meagan Schatzman vs Michelle Clevenger-Quinn / Amy Knight6-1, 6-1
2024-04-09vs Kirkpatrick/GRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJenifer Gravley / Brynne Hinkle vs Missy Torgerson / Julie Bunting1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLeah Maples / Meagan Schatzman vs Lindsey Kirkpatrick / Jamie Calkins6-4, 6-0
2024-04-04vs MoValley/Bailey Wolff/18&over2.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrooke Sawyer / Liberty Gorospe vs Emily Hale / Ashley Hoster2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJenifer Gravley vs Bailey Wolff1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Smith / Tiffany Osborne vs Vivian Rogers / Kelsey Robin2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MoValley/Bailey Wolff/18&over2.5W7120410122
2Green 1:Wills/TTC7119515160
3Green 2: Hatton/LF7115920158
4Orange 2: Amber Hendrix/LF6219513136
5Kirkpatrick/GR5316818158
6Knight/LF53111327214
7Hunt/LF44131127205
8Foust/CR44111328222
9Ellsworth/CR3491226189
10Hendrix Yellow 2.5/LF3591532246
11Gobbo/LF2561532215
12McCaskill/LF2691533261
13Venable/TU0851941271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Kendall Ellsworth
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Leah Maples
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Brooke Sawyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.45
Courtney Duffy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.33
Jenifer Gravley
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.32
Tiffany Osborne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Brynne Hinkle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.21
Megan McKinney
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
2.04
Liberty Gorospe
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Heather Smith
published
Meagan Schatzman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mia Perkins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liberty Gorospe + Mia Perkins6257% games+9.2% vs expected
Courtney Duffy + Kendall Ellsworth61143% games−0.2% vs expected
Liberty Gorospe + Kendall Ellsworth2343% gamesnot enough data
Kendall Ellsworth + Leah Maples3252% gamesnot enough data
Courtney Duffy + Tiffany Osborne134 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Duffy + Mia Perkins314 matchesnot enough data
Brynne Hinkle + Meagan Schatzman224 matchesnot enough data
Tiffany Osborne + Liberty Gorospe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendall Ellsworth
70W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%5%95%
2.73
Leah Maples
26W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Brooke Sawyer
14W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.49
3
Courtney Duffy
22W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.45
Jenifer Gravley
11W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.33
Tiffany Osborne
20W–48L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Brynne Hinkle
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan McKinney
13W–34L career · 8 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.21
Liberty Gorospe
23W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Heather Smith
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meagan Schatzman
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mia Perkins
19W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.