Teams

Foust/CR

2024 TUL ADULT 18 & Over League · 2.5 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 2.62 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-28vs Gulledge/ISWon 20
W#1 DoublesTammy Dixon / Guylene Dooman vs Debbie Crowley / Tammy Mattox6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTami Foust / Bailee Forrest vs Jennifer Mason / Joanna Majka6-1, 6-4
2024-05-14vs Green 2: Hatton/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesMargaret Hosier / Heather Conklin vs Emily Hatton / Nicole Swiggett3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesShayle Finch vs Ashley Kent5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Greenhaw / Cynthia Turner vs Megan Carpenter / Danielle Watson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-05-09vs McCaskill/LFWon 21
L#1 DoublesTami Foust / Bailee Forrest vs LaQuisha Epps / Tia Hill5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesShayle Finch vs Robin Hoskins7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStephanie Long / Ashlee Lowry vs Breyja Sood / Janell Miller6-0, 6-2
2024-04-23vs Hunt/LFWon 20
W#1 DoublesTammy Dixon / Guylene Dooman vs Darla Knight / Kristine Taylor7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Long / Cynthia Turner vs Elizabeth McNamara / Janet Gotwals6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-18vs Watson/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesTammy Dixon / Tami Foust vs Skylar Jackson / Alli McClain5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMary Maxey vs Hannah Harrelson6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Long / Ashlee Lowry vs Laura Watson / Alicia Slyter3-6, 4-6
2024-04-16vs Wyatt/SHWon 20
W#1 DoublesShayle Finch / Bailee Forrest vs Whitney Bingham / Sarah Garrow6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Greenhaw / Margaret Hosier vs Laura Barnes / Lisa Secrest6-2, 6-2
2024-04-02vs Hendrix Yellow 2.5/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesMargaret Hosier / Heather Conklin vs Katy Spangler / Marla Cole1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMary Maxey vs Holly Wall6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Greenhaw / Cynthia Turner vs Nicole McDaniel / Annie Higgins6-2, 6-2
2024-03-26vs Green 1:Wills/TTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Maxey / Heather Conklin vs Catie Herrin / Molly McCormick6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesShayle Finch vs Lauren Hunt2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Peterson / Guylene Dooman vs Jenna Testa / Edith Coen2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MoValley/Bailey Wolff/18&over2.5W7120410122
2Green 1:Wills/TTC7119515160
3Green 2: Hatton/LF7115920158
4Orange 2: Amber Hendrix/LF6219513136
5Kirkpatrick/GR5316818158
6Knight/LF53111327214
7Hunt/LF44131127205
8Foust/CR44111328222
9Ellsworth/CR3491226189
10Hendrix Yellow 2.5/LF3591532246
11Gobbo/LF2561532215
12McCaskill/LF2691533261
13Venable/TU0851941271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bailee Forrest
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Shayle Finch
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.37
Amy Greenhaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ashlee Lowry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Cynthia Turner
published 2.5
2.23
Heather Conklin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.07
Mary Maxey
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.03
Guylene Dooman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
1.98
Margaret Hosier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.92
Stephanie Long
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.91
Tami Foust
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Leslie Peterson
published
Tammy Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Maxey + Tami Foust1736% games+1.1% vs expected
Cynthia Turner + Amy Greenhaw3543% games−1.7% vs expected
Margaret Hosier + Amy Greenhaw5645% games−3.7% vs expected
Mary Maxey + Guylene Dooman1640% games−7.1% vs expected
Tami Foust + Margaret Hosier0623% games−21.8% vs expected
Guylene Dooman + Tami Foust2435% gamesnot enough data
Guylene Dooman + Tammy Dixon4166% gamesnot enough data
Mary Maxey + Leslie Peterson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bailee Forrest
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shayle Finch
34W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%44%56%
2.52
2.5
Amy Greenhaw
22W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Ashlee Lowry
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Cynthia Turner
13W–41L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Heather Conklin
18W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.23
Mary Maxey
47W–75L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Guylene Dooman
41W–106L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Margaret Hosier
24W–80L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Stephanie Long
7W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Tami Foust
25W–88L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Leslie Peterson
5W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tammy Dixon
10W–23L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.