Teams

Orange 2: Amber Hendrix/LF

2024 TUL ADULT 18 & Over League · 2.5 WOMEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-01vs MoValley/Bailey Wolff/18&over2.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeah Jappe / Amber Hendrix vs Bailey Wolff / Lucy Bishop6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAllison Creel vs Emily Hale1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesErin Rich / Brooke Meehan vs Vivian Rogers / Stephanie Smith6-1, 6-1
2024-05-29vs Ellsworth/CRWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmber Hendrix / Elizabeth Skelton vs Leah Maples / Kendall Ellsworth6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAllison Creel vs Mia Perkins6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCrystal Maguire / Leah Jappe vs Megan McKinney / Brooke Sawyer6-4, 6-0
2024-05-20vs Kirkpatrick/GRWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrooke Meehan / Erin Rich vs Julie Chadwick / Kathryn Junk6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAllison Creel vs Olivia Bliss6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHaddi Nunley / Samantha Evans vs Stephanie Chang / Anna Shain6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-01vs Gobbo/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesErin Rich / Elizabeth Skelton vs Keely Gobbo / Stephanie Harris6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLeah Jappe vs Amy Arnold6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSamantha Evans / Haddi Nunley vs Evie Stover / Jessica Williams3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-23vs Payne/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeah Jappe / Amber Hendrix vs Holly Bevill / Miranda Grimes6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBrooke Meehan vs Audrey Reeves6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Marshall / Kimberley Hendrix vs April Norred / Krista Sessions6-1, 6-1
2024-04-16vs Venable/TUWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmber Hendrix / Leah Jappe vs Tarynn Venable / Anna Lukes6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAllison Creel vs Jordin Gehring6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCrystal Maguire / Erin Rich vs Alicia Murdock / Micah Tjeerdsma6-1, 6-0
2024-04-08vs Coker/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberley Hendrix / Jennifer Marshall vs Jamie Huth / Jen Taylor3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Skelton vs Beth Peters6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHaddi Nunley / Erin Rich vs Leslie Southerland / Michelle Salyer7-5, 6-3
2024-04-03vs Knight/LFLost 12
W#1 DoublesErin Rich / Amber Hendrix vs Katie Raper-Cavener / Madeline Johnson6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Skelton vs Lisa Kramer2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Evans / Haddi Nunley vs Amy Knight / Susamma Rajan6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MoValley/Bailey Wolff/18&over2.5W7120410122
2Green 1:Wills/TTC7119515160
3Green 2: Hatton/LF7115920158
4Orange 2: Amber Hendrix/LF6219513136
5Kirkpatrick/GR5316818158
6Knight/LF53111327214
7Hunt/LF44131127205
8Foust/CR44111328222
9Ellsworth/CR3491226189
10Hendrix Yellow 2.5/LF3591532246
11Gobbo/LF2561532215
12McCaskill/LF2691533261
13Venable/TU0851941271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Brooke Meehan
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Allison Creel
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.89
Amber Hendrix
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.81
Leah Jappe
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.78
Erin Rich
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.54
Elizabeth Skelton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.54
Crystal Maguire
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.47
Jennifer Marshall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.32
Haddi Nunley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.17
Kimberley Hendrix
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Samantha Evans
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Haddi Nunley + Crystal Maguire5159% games+10.9% vs expected
Erin Rich + Brooke Meehan11362% games+6.8% vs expected
Amber Hendrix + Leah Jappe231357% games+5.6% vs expected
Allison Creel + Amber Hendrix9364% games+2.7% vs expected
Crystal Maguire + Brooke Meehan6847% games−4.6% vs expected
Leah Jappe + Brooke Meehan4166% gamesnot enough data
Kimberley Hendrix + Jennifer Marshall134 matchesnot enough data
Amber Hendrix + Erin Rich314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brooke Meehan
69W–29L career · 7 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Allison Creel
67W–31L career · 10 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Amber Hendrix
65W–50L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
Leah Jappe
63W–33L career · 9 lines in 2024
0%1%99%
2.81
Erin Rich
64W–28L career · 12 lines in 2024
0%2%98%
2.78
Elizabeth Skelton
23W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%38%62%
2.54
3
Crystal Maguire
51W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
2.54
Jennifer Marshall
18W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%58%42%
2.47
Haddi Nunley
43W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
Kimberley Hendrix
26W–82L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.17
Samantha Evans
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.