Teams

NNMWC/Lane/65 & Over/7.0W

2023 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-19vs NNM 7.0W Tanoan - GoodrumWon 21
W#1 DoublesSally Lane / Jo Ann Erikson vs Patty Amo / Colette Fitzpatrick6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEllen Herbertson / Joan Rozzoni vs Rhonda Letz / Beverly Goodrum4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJean Payne / Elizabeth McGuire vs Betsy Murphy / June Haughton6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-10-12vs NNM 7.0W SV - MagyaryWon 21
W#1 DoublesEllen Herbertson / Maggie Gonzalez vs Joanne Martin / MJ Gallahan6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLinda Wilson / Jo Ann Erikson vs Elizabeth Kerkmans / Jean Kennedy6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLea Beth Ladue / Barbara McBee vs Deborah Cavaliere / Kathy Clapp5-7, 0-6
2023-10-05vs NNM/Dosher/65 & Over/7.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaggie Gonzalez / Ellen Herbertson vs Jodi Holley / Donna Steege6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara McBee / Elizabeth McGuire vs Betsy Krzykowski / Rayme Romanik4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLinda Wilson / Jo Ann Erikson vs Janet Dosher / Liz Maruyama3-6, 2-6
2023-09-28vs NNM 7.0W SV - TrujilloWon 21
W#1 DoublesEllen Herbertson / Maggie Gonzalez vs Sylvia Trujillo / Sally Wisely6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLea Beth Ladue / Barbara McBee vs Sheila Delelles / Mary Ellen Schoen6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSally Lane / Chris Keshian vs Lucy Romero / Diana Russell7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-09-14vs NNM 7.0W Tanoan - GoodrumWon 21
W#1 DoublesSally Lane / Linda Wilson vs Betsy Murphy / Celeste Guillebaud6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKay Mixon / Jean Payne vs Patty Amo / Laurel Worth1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesEllen Herbertson / Maggie Gonzalez vs Beverly Goodrum / June Haughton6-1, 6-0
2023-09-07vs NNM 7.0W SV - MagyaryWon 30
W#1 DoublesSally Lane / Joan Rozzoni vs Joanne O'Keefe / MJ Gallahan7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKay Mixon / Maggie Gonzalez vs Kathy Clapp / Jean Kennedy6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBarbara McBee / Jean Payne vs Patricia Davis / Margie Green6-4, 6-3
2023-08-31vs NNM/Dosher/65 & Over/7.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Wilson / Jo Ann Erikson vs Penny Luehring / Betsy Krzykowski6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMaggie Gonzalez / Ellen Herbertson vs Donna Steege / Jodi Holley6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSally Lane / Joan Rozzoni vs Janet Dosher / Liz Maruyama3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-08-24vs NNM 7.0W SV - TrujilloLost 12
W#1 DoublesJo Ann Erikson / Linda Wilson vs Dottie Anastasi / Sylvia Trujillo6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSally Lane / Chris Keshian vs Diane Gutierrez / Janet Grado0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKay Mixon / Barbara McBee vs Lucy Romero / Diana Russell1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Jo Ann Erikson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.41
Maggie Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Ellen Herbertson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Lea Beth Ladue
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.95
Barbara McBee
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.94
Joan Rozzoni
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Elizabeth McGuire
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Chris Keshian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jean Payne
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kay Mixon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sally Lane
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Lane + Chris Keshian4748% games+10.2% vs expected
Sally Lane + Joan Rozzoni7165% games+7.7% vs expected
Ellen Herbertson + Maggie Gonzalez7459% games+4.4% vs expected
Sally Lane + Ellen Herbertson4259% games+4.0% vs expected
Jean Payne + Ellen Herbertson13454% games+1.3% vs expected
Ellen Herbertson + Joan Rozzoni5547% games−3.5% vs expected
Lea Beth Ladue + Barbara McBee5351% games−8.4% vs expected
Jean Payne + Joan Rozzoni4544% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jo Ann Erikson
119W–84L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
Maggie Gonzalez
68W–25L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Ellen Herbertson
88W–46L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Lea Beth Ladue
52W–76L career · 5 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Barbara McBee
41W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.95
Joan Rozzoni
88W–102L career · 3 lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.94
3.5
Elizabeth McGuire
51W–73L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Chris Keshian
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jean Payne
37W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kay Mixon
49W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sally Lane
62W–36L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.