Teams

NNM 7.0W Tanoan - Goodrum

2023 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-19vs NNMWC/Lane/65 & Over/7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatty Amo / Colette Fitzpatrick vs Sally Lane / Jo Ann Erikson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRhonda Letz / Beverly Goodrum vs Ellen Herbertson / Joan Rozzoni6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBetsy Murphy / June Haughton vs Jean Payne / Elizabeth McGuire3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-10-05vs NNM 7.0W SV - MagyaryWon 21
L#1 DoublesRhonda Letz / Beverly Goodrum vs Joanne O'Keefe / MJ Gallahan3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesColette Fitzpatrick / Laurel Worth vs Kathy Clapp / Joanne Martin6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPatty Amo / Diana Filliman vs Karen Martel / Elizabeth Kerkmans7-5, 7-6
2023-09-28vs NNM/Dosher/65 & Over/7.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatty Amo / Colette Fitzpatrick vs Janet Dosher / Betsy Krzykowski6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaurel Worth / June Haughton vs Kathleen Barrett / Rayme Romanik5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeverly Goodrum / Diana Filliman vs Penny Luehring / Jane Tabet6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-09-21vs NNM 7.0W SV - TrujilloLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurel Worth / June Haughton vs Dottie Anastasi / Sally Wisely0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Filliman / Betsy Murphy vs Diana Russell / Lucy Romero1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeverly Goodrum / Celeste Guillebaud vs IVY LANGAN / Mary Ellen Schoen0-6, 1-6
2023-09-14vs NNMWC/Lane/65 & Over/7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesBetsy Murphy / Celeste Guillebaud vs Sally Lane / Linda Wilson3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPatty Amo / Laurel Worth vs Kay Mixon / Jean Payne6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBeverly Goodrum / June Haughton vs Ellen Herbertson / Maggie Gonzalez1-6, 0-6
2023-08-31vs NNM 7.0W SV - MagyaryWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatty Amo / Laurel Worth vs Joanne O'Keefe / MJ Gallahan5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBeverly Goodrum / Jessie Barreras vs Deborah Cavaliere / Jean Kennedy4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJune Haughton / Celeste Guillebaud vs Karen Martel / Patricia Davis4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-24vs NNM/Dosher/65 & Over/7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesRhonda Letz / Diana Filliman vs Liz Maruyama / Diane Delfrate0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBetsy Murphy / June Haughton vs Penny Luehring / Betsy Krzykowski2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPatty Amo / Colette Fitzpatrick vs Janet Dosher / Kathleen Barrett6-3, 7-5
2023-08-17vs NNM 7.0W SV - TrujilloWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatty Amo / Colette Fitzpatrick vs Dottie Anastasi / Sylvia Trujillo3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJune Haughton / Laurel Worth vs Angie Dawson / Janet Grado6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDiana Filliman / Rhonda Letz vs Kathleen O'Bryan / IVY LANGAN6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Colette Fitzpatrick
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.86
Mary Mihaly
published
2.85
Celeste Guillebaud
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Betsy Murphy
published 3
Beverly Goodrum
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Diana Filliman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Jessie Barreras
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
June Haughton
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Laurel Worth
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Patty Amo
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Rhonda Letz
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Goodrum + Patty Amo5354% games+9.8% vs expected
Beverly Goodrum + Diana Filliman13755% games+3.2% vs expected
Mary Mihaly + Beverly Goodrum5261% games+1.8% vs expected
Laurel Worth + June Haughton3448% games+0.8% vs expected
Colette Fitzpatrick + Patty Amo6450% games−2.4% vs expected
Mary Mihaly + Diana Filliman13950% games−3.5% vs expected
Rhonda Letz + Diana Filliman6256% games−6.1% vs expected
Laurel Worth + Patty Amo4457% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Colette Fitzpatrick
93W–102L career · 5 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Mary Mihaly
78W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Celeste Guillebaud
52W–82L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Betsy Murphy
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Beverly Goodrum
76W–47L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Diana Filliman
123W–82L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Jessie Barreras
23W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
June Haughton
35W–43L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Laurel Worth
39W–63L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patty Amo
53W–91L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rhonda Letz
104W–118L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.