Teams

NNM/Dosher/65 & Over/7.0W

2023 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-12vs NNM 7.0W SV - TrujilloWon 21
L#1 DoublesJane Tabet / Penny Luehring vs Dottie Anastasi / Diane Gutierrez1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Dosher / Liz Maruyama vs Sally Wisely / Kathleen O'Bryan7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBetsy Krzykowski / Rayme Romanik vs Mary Ellen Schoen / IVY LANGAN6-1, 6-3
2023-10-05vs NNMWC/Lane/65 & Over/7.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesJodi Holley / Donna Steege vs Maggie Gonzalez / Ellen Herbertson3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBetsy Krzykowski / Rayme Romanik vs Barbara McBee / Elizabeth McGuire6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJanet Dosher / Liz Maruyama vs Linda Wilson / Jo Ann Erikson6-3, 6-2
2023-09-28vs NNM 7.0W Tanoan - GoodrumWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanet Dosher / Betsy Krzykowski vs Patty Amo / Colette Fitzpatrick4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Barrett / Rayme Romanik vs Laurel Worth / June Haughton7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPenny Luehring / Jane Tabet vs Beverly Goodrum / Diana Filliman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-21vs NNM 7.0W SV - MagyaryLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Steege / Jodi Holley vs Joanne O'Keefe / MJ Gallahan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJane Tabet / Betsy Krzykowski vs Joanne Martin / Elizabeth Kerkmans6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPeggy Jenner / Penny Luehring vs Margie Green / Deborah Cavaliere5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-09-07vs NNM 7.0W SV - TrujilloLost 12
L#1 DoublesJane Tabet / Jodi Holley vs Diane Gutierrez / Sally Wisely1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Dosher / Betsy Krzykowski vs Sylvia Trujillo / Janet Grado6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLiz Maruyama / Kathleen Barrett vs Diana Russell / Lucy Romero3-6, 4-6
2023-08-31vs NNMWC/Lane/65 & Over/7.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesPenny Luehring / Betsy Krzykowski vs Linda Wilson / Jo Ann Erikson4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Steege / Jodi Holley vs Maggie Gonzalez / Ellen Herbertson1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Dosher / Liz Maruyama vs Sally Lane / Joan Rozzoni6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-08-24vs NNM 7.0W Tanoan - GoodrumWon 21
W#1 DoublesLiz Maruyama / Diane Delfrate vs Rhonda Letz / Diana Filliman6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPenny Luehring / Betsy Krzykowski vs Betsy Murphy / June Haughton6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJanet Dosher / Kathleen Barrett vs Patty Amo / Colette Fitzpatrick3-6, 5-7
2023-08-17vs NNM 7.0W SV - MagyaryWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Dosher / Rayme Romanik vs Jean Kennedy / MJ Gallahan6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPenny Luehring / Betsy Krzykowski vs Margie Green / Deborah Cavaliere6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathleen Barrett / Peggy Jenner vs Jane Ryfun / Karen Martel7-5, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Donna Steege
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Liz Maruyama
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Betsy Krzykowski
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Diane Delfrate
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Penny Luehring
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Jodi Holley
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.62
Peggy Jenner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Tabet
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Janet Dosher
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Kathleen Barrett
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rayme Romanik
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Delfrate + Penny Luehring6650% games−2.3% vs expected
Janet Dosher + Kathleen Barrett191950% games−2.8% vs expected
Diane Delfrate + Peggy Jenner71541% games−8.8% vs expected
Liz Maruyama + Janet Dosher5260% gamesnot enough data
Donna Steege + Jodi Holley134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Tabet + Kathleen Barrett123 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Krzykowski + Penny Luehring213 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Holley + Peggy Jenner033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Donna Steege
20W–45L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Liz Maruyama
34W–22L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Betsy Krzykowski
8W–5L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Diane Delfrate
42W–58L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Penny Luehring
74W–153L career · 6 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Jodi Holley
136W–130L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
Peggy Jenner
38W–110L career · 2 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
Jane Tabet
16W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Janet Dosher
58W–65L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Barrett
40W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rayme Romanik
53W–61L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.