Teams

IE-LLW-David Cocker/Kathy C.

2021 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Mixed 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-29vs IE-SLCC-Whitney JohnsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Cocker / Allison Cocker vs Gary Johnson / Whitney Johnson6-3, 6-2
2021-08-15vs IE-SLCC-Whitney JohnsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathalena Cocker / Dang Nguyen vs Kelly Bollmann / Wonsik Bollmann6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Cocker / Alfonso Nevarez vs Gary Johnson / Whitney Johnson7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Danieri / Roseann Harris vs Elizabeth Manzo / Luis Manzo6-3, 6-1
2021-08-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesAllison Cocker / David Cocker vs Elizabeth Manzo / Luis Manzo6-3, 6-3
2021-08-01vs IE-SLCC-Whitney JohnsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Cocker / Allison Cocker vs Noriko Hanawa / Don Wickramasinghe6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathalena Cocker / Matthew Burns vs Wonsik Bollmann / Kelly Bollmann6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-03vs IE-SLCC-Whitney JohnsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathalena Cocker / Matthew Burns vs Gary Johnson / Whitney Johnson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRoseann Harris / Paul Danieri vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Mixed 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Stacey McCoy
published 4.5
4.01
Roseann Harris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.73
David Cocker
published 4
3.72
Amy Markham
published 4
3.63
Allison Cocker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Dang Nguyen
published 4
3.31
Kathalena Cocker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Sharon Hebert
published
3.26
Alfonso Nevarez
published 3.5
Matthew Burns
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stacey McCoy
145W–88L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Roseann Harris
96W–74L career · 2 lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
4.01
4
David Cocker
12W–12L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Amy Markham
9W–8L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Allison Cocker
42W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Dang Nguyen
5W–10L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Kathalena Cocker
136W–140L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.31
Sharon Hebert
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Alfonso Nevarez
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
Matthew Burns
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.