Teams

HV YELLOW

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.06 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-07vs SS-G ORANGESplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesHolly Schoolcraft / Morgan Walton vs Katherine Pahl / Jena Greer6-1, 6-2
L#2 Female SinglesAmy Beth Schulz vs Kaitlin Bernhoerster5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-30vs KNO NAVYLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesAmy Beth Schulz vs Jodi Page1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-16vs KC-RH YELLOWWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMorgan Walton / Holly Schoolcraft vs Kelly Molnar / Hannah Micheel6-4, 6-2
2025-06-02vs HRCA-N TEALLost 01
L#2 Female SinglesAmy Beth Schulz vs Rebecca Mendoza2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KNO NAVY601715100
2CACM PINK6014411109
3NJ NAVY5111717158
4VCC TEAL4211717144
5HV YELLOW4210818140
6CHCC YELLOW339918155
7KC-RH YELLOW3371123172
8SS-G ORANGE2471125191
9DTP GREEN1561225176
10DTC GREEN1561225172
11HRCA-N TEAL1561226173
12SS-D TEAL1551329195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Morgan Walton
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Rachel Gallen
published
3.15
Stacy Beharry
published
3.13
Holly Schoolcraft
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Brooke Burdic
published 3
2.74
Amy Beth Schulz
usually #2 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 3
2.65
Alexandra Beltz
published 3
2.64
2.56
Hannah Quintana
published 3
Elizabeth Bonder
published 2.5
Ruthie Strock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Goltermann + Stacy Beharry5057% games+12.6% vs expected
Morgan Walton + Holly Schoolcraft23658% games+4.7% vs expected
Alexandra Beltz + Hannah Quintana4348% games−5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Morgan Walton
42W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Rachel Gallen
29W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.17
Stacy Beharry
40W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.15
3.5
Holly Schoolcraft
42W–13L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
3
Brooke Burdic
29W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Amy Beth Schulz
41W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Alexandra Beltz
14W–20L career · type A · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Alison Goltermann
27W–18L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Hannah Quintana
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Elizabeth Bonder
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ruthie Strock
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.