Teams

SS-D TEAL

2025 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-14vs HV YELLOWLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesDani Calkins / Brigit McNair vs Alison Goltermann / Stacy Beharry0-6, 0-6
2025-07-07vs HRCA-N TEALLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesCaitlin Buckingham / Kasey Bowden vs Rebecca Mendoza / Molly Smith1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-23vs SS-G ORANGESplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesKasey Bowden / Dani Calkins vs Katherine Pahl / Emily Amack6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 Female SinglesCaitlin Buckingham vs Katie Benson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-16vs KNO NAVYLost 02
L#1 Female SinglesMelissa Heimbaugh vs Jodi Page3-6, 2-6
L#2 Female SinglesDani Calkins vs Victoria Greene3-6, 1-6
2025-06-09vs VCC TEALLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesCaitlin Buckingham / Abby Tardiff vs Rachel Hillis / Taylor Thornburgh0-6, 1-6
2025-06-02vs KC-RH YELLOWLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesMelissa Heimbaugh vs Anna Masiello3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KNO NAVY601715100
2CACM PINK6014411109
3NJ NAVY5111717158
4VCC TEAL4211717144
5HV YELLOW4210818140
6CHCC YELLOW339918155
7KC-RH YELLOW3371123172
8SS-G ORANGE2471125191
9DTP GREEN1561225176
10DTC GREEN1561225172
11HRCA-N TEAL1561226173
12SS-D TEAL1551329195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
2.85
Cassie Perez
published 3
2.74
Daniella Rowley
published 3
2.68
Melissa Heimbaugh
usually #1 Female Singles 100% · published 3
2.62
Abby Tardiff
published 2.5
2.55
Caitlin Buckingham
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 3
2.54
Brigit McNair
published 3
2.50
Kasey Bowden
published
2.47
Monica Feldman
published
2.28
Dani Calkins
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniella Rowley + Cassie Perez2354% games+4.4% vs expected
Caitlin Buckingham + Melissa Heimbaugh3744% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cheris Berlinberg
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Cassie Perez
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Daniella Rowley
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Melissa Heimbaugh
54W–41L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
Abby Tardiff
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62
3
Caitlin Buckingham
59W–64L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Brigit McNair
3W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Kasey Bowden
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
Monica Feldman
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
2.5
Dani Calkins
30W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.